Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanders Mic'ed up


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was really impressed with his vocal leadership. Here I am at home contemplating excitement because of draft pick but winning could help create a culture now that the entire O is young. Sanders, XL, Coker, Brooks is a nice core behind our OL regardless of what we do with Chubba. Just need a QB. Whether that is Bryce turning it around or Canales getting his guy, I like what we are building on O.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we ever had a 4th round pick pan out?  It’s still super early but this draft class gives me hope.  Already with 4 contributors in XL,TW,JT and JC and a possible 5th in Brooks would make this the most successful draft class in franchise history.

(I’m not saying it produced the best players just the best hit rate)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

dawgs

This year might suck, but I think we're on to something good with the youth movement. Whether or not it involves BY, which I doubt it will, I think we've got a good core starting.

And one thing I think we're seeing is the kids saying "we got this". I see them starting to step up.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...