Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Victory, 4-3, won 3 in a row


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

If you’ve been watching Panther football from their inception you would know this is how we used to win games. 

Kinda but our good seasons we'd pretty routinely blow out the worst teams in the league

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

XL's a BUST, he can't catch...nah a QB that can SEE him, and can throw downfield outside the numbers accurately played today.

XL came alive with Dalton last year too, its not a coincidence, the pace of our offense is completely different with Andy.

Not saying he should be the starter BUT he highlights Bryce's limitarions.

if his entire career is comprised of catching end zone TDs, i’m ok with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so damn proud of this team.  Was it an ugly win?  Of course.  But after the first two weeks of the season, who on this site hadn't written them off?  

They have literally been what Panthers football is all about: Keep Pounding.  Don't give up, keep playing hard, keep playing as a team, be physical.  How can a true Panthers fan not be proud of them?

We still need to keep getting better, no doubt about that.  But right now I am so freakin happy.

Edited by Mage
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Ugly win but we’ll take it. Jaycee Horn and Derrick Brown reminded the NFL how elite they are 

Definitely ugly and I’m glad we won, period. That said, when an 0-6 team that benched its QB has a chance to tie the game at the end, it just feels too close. It’s nice to see the studs play well and others step up but I’m definitely worried about the upcoming schedule.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...