Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ARTICLE: Panthers want to make a run at Deshaun Watson...clearing cap space to do so


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I’m not a fool, I know you have to have a team around a franchise guy, but comparing the Texans to a normal team isn’t fair either. They did nothing to build around him, as a matter of fact they traded away one of the best WR in the game for peanuts along with other terrible trades. The entire organization was bad from gm, to coaches, to the people they put around Watson. He put up MVP numbers despite how horrible the team was. You plug his numbers into our offense last season and we are easily a playoff team

Hmm maybe we are.  I mean we dont have any OTs at the moment and were losing Samuel. We wont be able to draft legitimate replacements because all of our picks are gone.  I like Deshaun but people on here qcting like Chinn, Burns, and Brown are untouchable...well what do you think 3 first round picks are?  Guys like that on rookie deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Hmm maybe we are.  I mean we dont have any OTs at the moment and were losing Samuel. We wont be able to draft legitimate replacements because all of our picks are gone.  I like Deshaun but people on here qcting like Chinn, Burns, and Brown are untouchable...well what do you think 3 first round picks are?  Guys like that on rookie deals.

Moton is going nowhere, and Tackles are 100x easier to find compared to a top 5 franchise QB. I understand we have holes, but my point is that a teams success starts and ends with a franchise QB. Building a team first compared to getting a franchise QB and building a team around him is the chicken or the egg debate. At the end of the day I can name a lot more talented teams without a franchise guy who can’t make it deep into the playoffs than I can teams with franchise QBs. Watson was the exception to this last year but almost every other team with a franchise QB was in the playoffs last year....the teams without one were not.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if the Texans decide not to trade him (which there is a good possibility) and we go into the draft with no Watson? What if we draft someone like Devonta Smith or Surtain? After the draft, or heck, during the season, do you think it’s possible the Texans trade him after finally realizing he won’t play for them? Maybe the Panthers are comfortable waiting it out and rolling into next season wit PJ or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Yeah, a billion years ago

The Broncos won with a barely mobile quarterback just five years ago.

With that said, we're talking about a formula that's netted teams one Super Bowl under the flukiest of circumstances. Nobody's built a consistent contender that way.

That's not an example I want to see us follow.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

What if the Texans decide not to trade him (which there is a good possibility) and we go into the draft with no Watson? What if we draft someone like Devonta Smith or Surtain? After the draft, or heck, during the season, do you think it’s possible the Texans trade him after finally realizing he won’t play for them? Maybe the Panthers are comfortable waiting it out and rolling into next season wit PJ or something. 

In that scenario, hopefully we can trade back and net another 1st rounder next year.  Make our picks hopefully filling a few holes. Continue to stay in touch in case Houston changes their mind. If not, sign a vet to compete with PJ.

If at any time before the season, during the season, or at seasons end they decide to trade Watson, you have two 1st in the 2022 draft. If the 2022 draft arrives without Watson, you have ammo to go up and get Rattler, Shough, or Howell

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ncbob said:

I don’t think he would want to come here after we trade away our draft assets and he has to play behind a o-line that can’t protect him. Also we’ll have a defense that gives up 30+ a game cause we traded away our future. How is this attractive to Watson?

It’s not like we can’t add people in free agency and we don’t have rds 2 through 7 left 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, USC/panthers_11 said:

I hope Tepper doesn't turn into another meddling owner.

Does the new GM and Rhule really want to tie up their entire future into 1 player? It doesn't seem like a risk they would want to take.

Your fears have already been realized.

They're not really making that call...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Yes Verge did. I think we will be a major player in the Watson sweepstakes if he becomes available. Tepper seems set on getting who he wants in order to change our franchise around and give the fans some hope. We all know we are going nowhere with Teddy and we desperately need a franchise QB

I thought tepper wanted teddy? For as many first rounders we give up, we better replace each with Lombardi's. Our luck the texans get to super bowl before we do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...