Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBC's Peter King wont be suprised if Mac Jones goes ahead of Lance


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.nbcsports.com/edge/football/nfl/player-news/headlines/9986211?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

 

"King cited a source from a QB-needy NFL team who said Lance's lack of recent play -- he's played one game in the past 414 days -- makes him an iffy selection as a top-10 pick."

 

I swear, if we take Mac Jones in the top 10.  Ill be done with Tepper, Rhule, and Fitterer.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

https://www.nbcsports.com/edge/football/nfl/player-news/headlines/9986211?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

 

"King cited a source from a QB-needy NFL team who said Lance's lack of recent play -- he's played one game in the past 414 days -- makes him an iffy selection as a top-10 pick."

 

I swear, if we take Mac Jones in the top 10.  Ill be done with Tepper, Rhule, and Fitterer.

Like I have said since day 1.  Lance will be there at 8 the question is will the panther still be there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

This is great pending we aren’t the team he is referencing 

I do think Mac Jones could see the field and be ready for legit NFL reps before Lance is ready 

I think Jones is the safer pick in that respect.  His ceiling is lower, his floor may be higher, and his timeline to be ready to go in the NFL is probably shorter.  That is not to say he is the right pick, but safer for somebody looking to go that route. 

I've heard his name mentioned with New England a lot.  That might surprise Peter King unless the Pats trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaqattaq said:

Jones in ATL makes perfect sense. They even look alike.

image.jpeg.025540a50923d7ae16a2251074b47495.jpeg  image.jpeg.b65a371a22d69967983d4bdfc63e047c.jpeg

Right?!

Not to mention their recent trend of picking unexpected players in R1 in recent years. 

My only concern is Arthur Smith actually knows what he's doing so we can hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales paired w/ Bryce has been figured out.   I think Canales is pretty simplistic.  Which he told us when we hired him.   You need a QB like Baker he is flat out going to make big throws downfield.  Or a Jake.  He isn't some modern day scheme dude.  Run run set up the downfield stuff.  It's not going to be the scheme but players that win.  I mean, it's not literally every possession but that was every passing O Canales has ever been around and it's the core of what his O is structured to be.  Bryce doesn't fit that.  Bryce needs a modern day playcaller and scheme w/ the weapons to go with it.  Dave issue is the same as the Frank issue ultimately.  We got a front office that is building something that actually syncs up.  Failure by design.  If you wanted Bryce, you don't hire Frank.  Or Dave.  And you don't draft XL.  You draft Ladd.  Carolina makes simple hard.   Which you see that a lot in life. 
    • I felt like this season was over back in 2023. Game 1. I hate that I am being serious.     
    • Well if we're going to dumpster dive at least we're looking on the roster of a contender.
×
×
  • Create New...