Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

See, that's where your theory goes off the rails.  He won't be on last year's team.  He will be on whatever is left of it.  Which won't be no where as talented or lucky as last year's.  

Yeah, his brain couldn't think through that hypothetical critically.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Was Palmer traded or released? I've forgotten.

(I could look it up but I'm feeling lazy)

He requested a trade after the 2010 season, owner said no fug you.  So Carson decided to retire, and Bengals placed him on reserved/retired list.  That same off-season the Bengals drafted Andy Dalton and halfway through the season they saw that Andy was going to be their next franchise QB, so they ended up trading Carson to the Raiders after their starter Jason Campbell got hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeSim said:

He requested a trade after the 2010 season, owner said no fug you.  So Carson decided to retire, and Bengals placed him on reserved/retired list.  That same off-season the Bengals drafted Andy Dalton and halfway through the season they saw that Andy was going to be their next franchise QB, so they ended up trading Carson to the Raiders after their starter Jason Campbell got hurt. 

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MVPccaffrey said:

What's a better new handle?  WatsonMVP, MostValuableWatson, DeshaunHercules, TheDeushaunExpress, WhatCanDeshaunDoForYou, or WatsonMyMind?

I don't know...according to the latest news FillerUpWatson might be a good choice. 

(Totally kidding)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

Yup, and I didn't even mention what the Raiders ended up giving up for him...a 1st and a 2nd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

He got decapitated by Greg Hardy once. Other than that, he didn’t do much in Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Apparently they had the best QB ever and still sucked rod. 

Deondre  made Watson look better.

Watson had easily his best season ever without Deondre. There's no excuse for not knowing this given how easy it is to find out.

They still sucked because you need a good team to be a good team.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...