Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers don't love other QB's besides Lawrence and Wilson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Funny.

They were literally saying the same thing last year with the top 1-2 QBs then said they were Much higher on This QB class and would rather grab one from This crop.

 

now that they’ve put themselves in QB purgatory and not in range to draft one. All of a sudden we claim that we don’t like these QBs? 
Bunch of PR bs

Edited by ncfan
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Different regime same as the old. Always reactionary instead of being proactive. If we pass on Fields or Lance I’m done. 

I think what you're saying is backwards.  To me, reaching on a QB, especially with the 8th overall pick, that the scouting team and coaches dont really like just because they need one would be the definition of reactionary.  

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Funny.

They were literally saying the same thing last year with the top 1-2 QBs then said they were Much higher on This QB class and would rather grab one from This crop.

 

now that they’ve put themselves in QB purgatory and not in range to draft one. All of a sudden we claim that we don’t like these QBs? 
Bunch of PR bs

if this turns out to be true I would worry that ownership or the Deep Scouting side has the same awful ethos that you'll find on this forum, where the same 10 posters are always suggesting we wait until the next class when the perfect prospect may fall to us whereever were drafting

unless you're picking at #1, the guy you're taking has question marks, and those question marks will look a certain way relative to each position

you don't pass on talented players just because you're waiting for the perfect prospect perfect scenario unicorn that never comes 

 

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...