Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Darnold is a flop like Teddy was, is Rhule officially on the hot seat?


If Darnold is a flop, is Rhule on the hot seat?  

94 members have voted

  1. 1. Well?

    • Yes
      35
    • No, means nothing
      59


Recommended Posts

Not on the hot seat, especially with that contract, but if we don't start the 2022 season with our future on the roster, yikes. 

Then the question of, "what the hell have we been doing for 3 years?", will be a valid question and some seats should be warming.  Whether it be an established vet or a rookie in 2022, our franchise QB needs to be here.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you gotta give coaches that show progress 3-5 years. By then the team should made up entirely of their decisions and students.

1 and done or 2 and dones are reserved for the winless dumpster fires that lose their locker room.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Let's say that Darnold flops. Does Rhule enter 2022 on the hot seat?

If Darnold flops, potentially giving us a top 3 pick......at this point, the next QB he picks would be his last. I would like to think, since he signed a 10 year deal or however long that was. So he'd be safe but it would be his last chance I'd think, so yeah, I guess it would be the hot seat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...