Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watsons Lawyer Came With Receipts


Jorgie
 Share

Recommended Posts

"These range from being misleading, to fraudulent, to slanderous," the document says. "Importantly, only two of the twenty-two lawsuits allege that Mr. Watson forced any type of sexual activity -- an allegation Mr. Watson again vehemently denies."

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/31290199/deshaun-watson-attorney-files-response-22-lawsuits-houston-texans-qb

after eight of the plaintiffs massaged Watson, each "bragged about, praised, and were excited about massaging Mr. Watson." The document also says seven plaintiffs "willingly worked or offered to work with Mr. Watson after their alleged incidents," three plaintiffs "lied about the number of sessions they actually had" with Watson, three plaintiffs "lied about their alleged trauma and resulting harm" and five plaintiffs "told others they wanted to get money out of" Watson.

  • Pie 7
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always the truth is always somewhere in the middle...

I’m not going to fault the Panthers or any team for waiting until this all played out. I said it when this all started, moving ahead with Watson sent a message that the franchise simply didn’t care if he did or didn’t do the things he was accused of. 

The response raises some very questionable conduct on the behalf of the accusers. But if there was actual misconduct their actions shouldn’t minimize, what others may have went through. 

this is a crazy world we live in, but these matters deserve the attention and legitimate investigation on both sides. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair... a handful may be lying, just like some may be telling the truth. Assaulting even one of them is one too many.

That said, the defense of "Defendants lied about their trauma because they went back to work" is a pretty shitty fuging defense to use. 

As from day 1, ill wait for all of it to play out before making judgement, something id urge all of you.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

These cases are super delicate. It's best to just reserve ones opinion until the facts have been brought in. 

 

I for one am going to wait for this to be played out. 

There will never be anything close to a resolution in a case like this. It's going to be 98% he said/she said with each side spiking the football over every minute piece of actual factual evidence they can produce to spin in a way as to support their side of the story. It's going to be a mess and that's why we moved on from what was basically our plan A, B, and C. We were all in on Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's going to be 98% he said/she said with each side spiking the football over every minute piece of actual factual evidence they can produce to spin in a way as to support their side of the story.

Kinda like the first post in this thread?

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sexual assault always comes down to he said, she said because most of the time it lacks physical evidence. this group is only as strong as their weakest link because if one of the lied. they are just going to poke at her, as if the entire group is nothing but liars. 

the whole thing stinks and even if Watson is innocent, he has huge judgement issue. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Italianpantherfan said:

No disrespect but no one cares about Watson he’s not a panther I’m sick of seeing Watson posts this is a panther forum

well we're getting a little tired of olive garden so maybe consider that 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...