Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watsons Lawyer Came With Receipts


Jorgie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will reserve judgement until this settles (if it even does) but some interesting notes:

-Only 2 lawsuits claim forced sexual incidents took place

-Of the 2 that were sexual in nature, for 1 (the lesbian therapist), Watson's attorneys pose that they have damning receipt-based evidence (or) other people providing information counter to her filings.

-One showed up at his door unannounced to give him an extra massage

-Another would text & offer him to a massage after his games

-Still though, it doesn't mean this is all a farce.  He very well may have crossed the lines from a professional standpoint and furthermore, clearly has a porn-inspired massage fetish.  I think the snowballing of cases could lead this to backfire on the plaintiffs and the legitimate ones may get lumped in with the false ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Or maybe have a paid professional on staff, rather than umpteen random women who you contact through IG.

This is the most correct answer.

Watson would be well advised to stick with the Texans massage therapist going forward.  

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea a big red flag to me was continuing working with him after these alleged sexual encounters. It doesn’t mean he’s innocent but it punches a big hole in the prosecutions case if it comes to that. Reminds me of the kobe money grab honestly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

Yea a big red flag to me was continuing working with him after these alleged sexual encounters. It doesn’t mean he’s innocent but it punches a big hole in the prosecutions case if it comes to that. Reminds me of the kobe money grab honestly 

Kobe admitted to raping that woman.

"The facts are not up for interpretation: On June 30, 2003, at the Lodge & Spa at Cordillera in Eagle, Colorado, Kobe invited a 19-year-old employee of the spa into his room after she’d shown him around the facility. They began kissing consensually, but when he took off his pants, she tried to leave. He then groped her, ignored her multiple requests to leave, choked her hard enough to leave bruises on her neck, physically blocked her from leaving the room, ignored more of her requests to stop, and forcibly penetrated her, only stopping when she aggressively resisted. “Every time I said no he tightened his hold around me,” she told police. The day after, a nurse observed the woman and, according to a detective from the sheriff’s office, “stated that the injuries were consistent with penetrating genital trauma. That it’s not consistent with consensual sex.”

“Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did. After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.”

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Tin-foil hat time, folks! 

 

Gotta love it when someone (who more than likely is using either a burner account or was previously banned) uses his first post to put out an absolute doozy of a statement.  🤨

 

I think it's the former.    Wouldn't be surprised if there is someone here who wants to put out his very unpopular (and absurd) take on this and is using a "new" account to do so instead of using his regular one. 

 

(of course I could be proven wrong by Scot or Rayzor but I'm just throwing that out there)

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...