Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2021 Mock Draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Verge said:

I do think Parsons is maybe a bit overrated. I like JOK better as well as guys like Philips and the top two corners. 

Well, I admittedly have a strong ND and U of SC bias.   But our U of SC picks have historically overachieved IMO.  But that probably is more about where they were drafted.  

I personally think Parsons is better.  But like I said above.    
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

@Varking you still feel comfy about our bet?.....

I remember we made a bet but I don’t remember the specifics. But yeah, our bet was about adding/changing our signature to what the other person says for a season so long as it’s not vulgar or bannable? I’m always down for actual friendly wagers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I remember we made a bet but I don’t remember the specifics. But yeah, our bet was about adding/changing our signature to what the other person says for a season so long as it’s not vulgar or bannable? I’m always down for actual friendly wagers. 

Bet was Lance would be within 10 picks of where Fields was drafted.....I felt super comfy then and on cloud 99 weeks before the draft....

I bet Lance would be within 10 picks. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Verge said:

As another note, a lot of teams are going to opt for players who did not opt out last year and that could very well be a draft night trend, so watch out for that.  Let's get it. 



8. Carolina Panthers
Penei Sewell, OT, ORE 
Nat's notes:  This is obviously a dream scenario and one that as you can see, could easily play out. Slam dunk pick for a team that has been looking for their starting LT since Jordan Gross retired. If Detroit sticks at 7 and picks Sewell, Slater would make a ton of sense as well. Protect Sam Darnold or give him a weapon (Waddle/Smith) 

 

I have noticed a trend of Slater moving up ahead of Sewell. Since both opted out of 2020 how comfortable are you on a scale of 1-10 that the Panthers have Sewell above Slater?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 8 is pretty close to mine. I had New England trading up to 4 for Fields, DeVonta Smith going to Miami (although I agree that Pitts is more likely the pick,) and the Lions staying put and taking Sewell.

I’m pretty sure 1-3 are set in stone at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...