Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

45.9 is Darnold's best year, bro.

I have zero idea what point you’re trying to make here… Tannehill averaged 5 point higher QBR his first 3 years, therefore Sam cannot take a leap forward and become a solid starter? Help me connect your dots 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Did you see our roster?

Yeah and most of the prior year's roster went to Washington or Buffalo. Two teams that went to the playoffs.

Rivera was done here, it was obvious and his OC and DC were terrible. Just not sure we don't have the same thing all over again, but with a set of college coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Not a bad pick. Both Moore and Anderson are only on one year deals. I suspect we'll pay Moore and let Anderson walk and take the comp pick. This kid seems like a natural replacement for Anderson.

Moore has 2 years left (we picked up his option), but yeah Robby only has one left.  Not against this pick at all.  Finally did something for Offense.  Now let’s get some a big man or two in the third 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rico6 said:

Talent wise I’m cool with, but overall I agree with your sentiments. Panthers are drafting like they just won a super bowl. And not coming off back-to-back losing seasons

He's a great player, huge potential, but damn we have a lot of offensive weapons right now.

It's odd how much has changed from before. Before we had a quarterback carrying our offense, and now it looks like we're trying to build an offense that will carry the quarterback(s).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not liking our 2nd round, I'm hoping for the best but trading back for a WR,  a spot we don't really need, after having a 1st round talent fall into your lap at 52 is questionable to me

Edited by beo
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • We only have 5 sacks which is dead last. Some teams have 20-30. Our pass rush is atrocious, worst in the league. That’s why we’re 22nd in scoring defense even with a shutout. That Atlanta game helps our rankings so much, but we’ll likely trend down over the season as it counts for 6% instead of 17%. Personally, the yardage numbers can be deceiving which is why I like scoring defense as a better representation. We of course look way better than last year but I wouldn’t consider it a top 10 defense yet.
    • You mean he got crap in 2005 after taking us to the NFC Championship. I don't remember that honestly but am not saying that is it not true. But in either case do you think it was justified?
    • Agree especially with BC at ROT I was thinking of this game primarily when I said that. They have been pretty good with adapting to different combinations this year. As far as it goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...