Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Double dip SEC CB's, select Tyson Campbell in round 2


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I really like Tyson Campbell.  He had a good amount of success against similar competition as Horn.  And our secondary could use more talent.  But I'd prefer to allocate draft capital to other areas.  We need a safety more than another CB.  We need offensive line help.  And so as much as I like Campbell, I can't imagine he's head and shoulders better on the draft board than the top players at other players still available.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We just drafted a potential Ramsey level guy at #8. So.. Let’s please just grab a OL before the tier drop. We have to consider need as much as there is talent with on DB.

Surprised Jenkins made it out of the first. Humphrey is a plug and play at LG or C. Radunz, Eichenberg, Spencer Browm, Cosmi all really solid options.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If we take another DB I’d like Richie Grant. There would be no excuses for the defense. We’d have talent at all levels. 

How did I forget about this. This could legit happen. 

Fitterrer gets his new legion of boom.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...