Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What will a week 1 loss to the Jets do to Darnold?


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we lose to the Jets then my fall opens up tremendously and I see a ton of fishing being done.  Having said that I think there is about a 5% chance we lose to them.  Vegas says we are -4 so I may be dropping some coin on the Cats for week 1.

 

I think we will be 3-0 heading to Dallas and 4-1 after the Eagles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Call Me James said:

Are people already hedging about a loss to the Jets after months of talking about how they are a hapless team, devoid of talent, and direction. 

Well, we did just sign one of the reasons they sucked to be the leader of our team, so….

(just a joke Darnold fans.)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I’m more interested how Sam looks mid season. But fair weathered fans who don’t understand football will be livid I’m sure.

The Jets have made some good moves this off-season that I really liked, especially the coaching. A loss won’t mean much. Our record after 8/9 games will matter more.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, onmyown said:

Personally I’m more interested how Sam looks mid season. But fair weathered fans who don’t understand football will be livid I’m sure.

The Jets have made some good moves this off-season that I really liked, especially the coaching. A loss won’t mean much. Our record after 8/9 games will matter more.

 But the week 1 matchup matters too IMO.  Because of what the Jets are.  Because Zach Wilson will also being learning a new scheme, with new coaches, new players, and less talent......and he won't have 3 years starting experience in the NFL under his belt like Sam.   So Sam has to look better than Zach Wilson IMO week 1.   And if we lose.....it will say something about Rhule and Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a long list of QBs that were MVPs, ROY, made a Pro bowl in their first year (Vince Young) who didn’t do so well the remainder of their NFL career.  Doesn’t take long for a DC to figure them out.  Sam’s three years could help, or it may prove he’s not a starter in the NFL.  We’ll see, all I know is the Jets are a significantly better team that Wilson is walking into, than Sam had.  Coaches, focus on top OL and especially the GM.  We’ll see, no?
 

Still sticks in my craw that they drafted AVT, they don’t deserve him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

 But the week 1 matchup matters too IMO.  Because of what the Jets are.  

Like us, no one knows what the jets are with all the turnover.  The 2020 jets are long gone.

Quote

Because Zach Wilson will also being learning a new scheme, with new coaches, new players , and less talent.....

Their coaches are all rookies as well.  Saleh has never been head coach before and LaFleur has never been OC before.

Quote

So Sam has to look better than Zach Wilson IMO week 1.   And if we lose.....it will say something about Rhule and Darnold. 

It will say something, but we have no game details, game context, or season performance...so its hard to already assign blame accurately.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked him when he was at Michigan because I'm a Wolverine homer. After that... 
    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
×
×
  • Create New...