Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

YOU'RE ALLOWED TO BRING BACK TWO PANTHERS IN THEIR PRIME TO THIS YEARS TEAM... WHO AND WHY?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam is the obvious answer, as his 2015 season was the best season ever by a panther. His 2015 season had him as the best player in the NFL.

The second pick is where it gets a bit tricky and hard for me. Gross would help in solidifying the line, but Luke might be the best linebacker to have ever played in this game. For me, solidifying the line is most important, so I’d give Gross the slight edge and go with him. Cam and Gross

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Cam is the obvious answer, as his 2015 season was the best season ever by a panther. His 2015 season had him as the best player in the NFL.

The second pick is where it gets a bit tricky and hard for me. Gross would help in solidifying the line, but Luke might be the best linebacker to have ever played in this game. For me, solidifying the line is most important, so I’d give Gross the slight edge and go with him. Cam and Gross

I think this conversation gets more interesting if we exclude Cam, tbh.  Or we assume QB is already Cam, haha.  In that case, Luke seems like the next best choice... but imagine if we have the opportunity to give Prime Cam Prime Gross AND Prime Kalil ?  I feel like we would just walk all over EVERYONE, lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I was as well and I watched Jake play long before Cam. 

Jake was a career 59% completion guy, Cam was at 60% its a wash, Jake had zero in the rushing department.

Its cool you like Jake because reasons, but the reasons are not because he was better than Cam in his prime at anything.

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Don't worry, we would. So would basically everyone else in the NFL given those two scenarios.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Lol great stat, I will take Cam over Jake anytime, thanks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if just 2 its Luke and Cam. Forget positional needs. Cam was not really down by 4 in 2015 so save Jake's stat...Cam also never had 5 turnovers in the NFC vhampionship game so Cam > cajun bowl cut and I love Jake. My original sign up name was Jambalayah! in honor of Jake's signing but Cam and Jake are not in the same dimension. 

Edited by TANTRIC-NINJA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Poverty franchise behavior.  If you don't like him as a 3rd rounder then why'd you draft him there?  As others have said, they likely found out some new information and have buyer's remorse. Our FO didn't give DJ Johnson a hard time for being a bad pick.
    • Best I heard its a clause the bungals want to add. It prevents them form paying the full guaranteed amount if triggered. No one knows the details of the clause, but guesses are it relates to off-field stuff. Stewart is in the right here. Before they signed burrow, chase, and Higgins they were the cheapest team in the league bar none. Unlike tepper or jarrah Jones or any other NFL ownership, all Mike brown owns is the beagals. Every other owner has many other money making businesses, not bungals.  I still remember when Brenston Bunker was starting on WFNZ and he told the story about the beagals telling him to pick a used cup form a huge pile, LOLS! They been on hard knocks and I remember Marvin lewis telling the players not to take home Gatorade bottles........* but in that case, I believe some players were taking a back pack and filling it up with drinks. Still you make millions(around 200million) in net profit and Im sure coke gave the team those bottles, still... Its a 32 team billion business, someone has to the cheapest.....Panthers were around the next cheapest team before tepper bought them and he has POURED millions upon millions into the team. He bought a bubble that Richardson never would, so the team had to gather in a old building during the rain. He spent millions on coofus machines that he just gave away like the bubble. Tepper made that AC trailer a thing. I've trashed him about his concerts and taking away end zone seats from fans. But the guy will spend money any way in efforts to better the team, dang I just remembered the deal he gave Rhule- more than Andy Reid at the time.  I know results have not came, but Id 100% take Tepper over Mike brown as a owner.
    • There's no way they're shipping you some uniform you haven't seen lol.  I feel like they'd just refund you and ask if you wanted the new one when it launched. Probably just making the blues the primary, or a new helmet for a new alternate/variation.
×
×
  • Create New...