Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Execs rank the Panthers in the nfc


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Falcons are baffling. What are they doing? It looks like they're going full rebuild but ha going onto Matt Ryan? He's likely to keep them out of position to get his legit successor while eating up massive cap space. If they're gonna rebuild, they should've dealt him 

yeah they're kinda half and half ing it

of course none of you want think about it but there's one team that makes a lot of sense for the end of ryan's career.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

yeah they're kinda half and half ing it

of course none of you want think about it but there's one team that makes a lot of sense for the end of ryan's career.....

I hated the Teddy signing because it turned out to be exactly what I expected. A lot of money for a guy who would be just good enough to keep us out of reach of the top QB prospects. At least Darnold has boom/bust potential. I just hope it's one or the other. Be the answer or suck bad enough to get us the answer.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I hated the Teddy signing because it turned out to be exactly what I expected. A lot of money for a guy who would be just good enough to keep us out of reach of the top QB prospects. At least Darnold has boom/bust potential. I just hope it's one or the other. Be the answer or suck bad enough to get us the answer.

see, that is where we disagree.  Sam Darnold can 100% look like the exact same guy from NY....and we end up 8-9 or 7-10

Sam's bad isn't top pick bad....unless you the tank your roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, PandaMan said:

Thinking Teddy would be a better option than Darnold already nullifies the rest of that voter’s opinion.  Couldn’t be any more wrong.  Did he even watch the team play?  
 

but, yeah.  It’s fair.  Inconsistent ratings for an inconsistent team.  

It has to be Hurney. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could be good, or we could be nightmare terrible. That's is perfectly reasonable. You could reasonably predict any kind of record and make your case for it. If Darnold is terrible then this team will be a dumpster fire. If any teams QB turns out to be terrible you're looking at a disaster. We have NO idea what Darnold is going to do this season. Unless you've had access to all of our practices you don't know what's coming.

Preseason has not told us anything. One play Darnold holds the ball and shuffles his feet for what felt like and hour trying to go deep. Are we getting that Darnold? We'll get destroyed. Other plays he was on time and target with his throws. Are we getting Darnold? Could have a winning season. Who knows. The sample size of what we've seen is too small.

The Panthers coaching staff knows what is coming. The rest of us have the privilege of being surprised when the season starts. 

The defense is good enough to hold it's own if the offense is doing it's part. If the offense is a sackfest of 3 and outs, then it won't matter what we do on defense. It's too hard to stop passes in today's NFL, so our defense will crumble without a good offense. It's all on Darnold if this doesn't work. He weapons all around him, and we will NEVER have a premium o-line, so it's now or hit the bricks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

if we win a third of the one-score losses from last year we're a playoff team.

This Right Here. Literally we hung in with the Chiefs til the end. If we had CMC last year we wouldve made it. Seems like a good assessment of the team. Its really about what we get out of Darnold. Every position but LB and Oline is stacked. Defense alone will keep us in every game. Its just if the offense can click.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pantherj said:

We could be good, or we could be nightmare terrible. That's is perfectly reasonable. You could reasonably predict any kind of record and make your case for it. If Darnold is terrible then this team will be a dumpster fire. If any teams QB turns out to be terrible you're looking at a disaster. We have NO idea what Darnold is going to do this season. Unless you've had access to all of our practices you don't know what's coming.

Preseason has not told us anything. One play Darnold holds the ball and shuffles his feet for what felt like and hour trying to go deep. Are we getting that Darnold? We'll get destroyed. Other plays he was on time and target with his throws. Are we getting Darnold? Could have a winning season. Who knows. The sample size of what we've seen is too small.

The Panthers coaching staff knows what is coming. The rest of us have the privilege of being surprised when the season starts. 

The defense is good enough to hold it's own if the offense is doing it's part. If the offense is a sackfest of 3 and outs, then it won't matter what we do on defense. It's too hard to stop passes in today's NFL, so our defense will crumble without a good offense. It's all on Darnold if this doesn't work. He weapons all around him, and we will NEVER have a premium o-line, so it's now or hit the bricks.

I think we're going to get good Darnold & bad Darnald throughout the season. It will at least be more entertaining than watching the Teddy.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I think we're going to get good Darnold & bad Darnald throughout the season. It will at least be more entertaining than watching the Teddy.  

Here's a question for you :

Will the team be able to offset the "bad Darnold" and win some games he struggles in?    (this is where CMC comes in and where the "D" steps up, I think)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should do everything they can to prop up their investment in a QB regardless of who it is. 
    • I am not wanting to be too judgemental of Morgan over his first draft given the circumstances.  People don’t like my rationale but you know, I don’t so much like theirs either.  I was adamantly against drafting Bryce and very resentful over the extreme (imo) measures taken to prop him up. I feel like Dan got caught in that trap with demands or conditions placed on him to help out the QB and the new Offensive minded head coach.  And my biased opinion is that it was still all Bryce centric. Micro managed and solely focused on making him a viable player after his first disastrous season. Mandated to help the offense in that draft.  I feel like my speculation is reasonable given the climate and situation, and it includes the reasons we didn’t take a C, the reasons we overdrafted a RB and that particular WR. It was totally need based. Perceived needs. All to maximize Bryce.    And if it were me, and I wanted the GM slot of my team that I came up with, I would be willing to accede to the agenda that I feel was in place. The goals he had to meet.  It is pretty simple, just put Bryce’s needs at the center of everything that was done and work your way through it.  I have no idea or inside info, and people have mocked my opinion for it but that is what it is, it still makes sense to me. 
    • We can’t lose this guy he is the brains behind the operation 
×
×
  • Create New...