Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Panthers lose to the Jets.....


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Chiefzack said:

I don't think under any scenario (Barring 2-3 pick 6 or deep in our territory)should we lose this game. 

If we lose, Phil Snow needs to be fired... This Jets team is missing key offensive pieces, is starting a rookie QB against a brand new head coach... 

Phil Snow has been given a top 10 defensive roster, unless we lose like 12-7, this loss will be on the defense if we lose.

5mmnyc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Rhule would be fired if we picked in the Top 5.

Rhule wont be fired after his second season.  I would pretty much bet on it.  He inherited the start of a rebuild.  Tepper seems impatient sometimes but he has mentioned the rebuild multiple times, the same as Rhule has.  While Tepper really doesn't worry about money much most likely he didnt give Rhule such a long contract planning on firing after his second season of a rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we lost, the whole Darnold revenge game / Jets ruining him thing would sting and would definitely call for some memes and other trash talk to deal with for the next week.

the worst part is that it would feel like we're still a team that people laugh at and aren't intimated by. I'm okay with losses, as long as they come with hard fought wins and toughness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a 1 on the Delhomme scale is the opening day loss to the Saints in 2005 and a 10 on the Delhomme scale is throwing 5 INTS and losing a fumble against the Cardinals in 2008, losing to the Jets on opening day would be a 5 or 6 imo.  Really throws a turd in the punch bowl and could lead to a domino effect that screws up the season like the Denver loss in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Rhule wont be fired after his second season.  I would pretty much bet on it.  He inherited the start of a rebuild.  Tepper seems impatient sometimes but he has mentioned the rebuild multiple times, the same as Rhule has.  While Tepper really doesn't worry about money much most likely he didnt give Rhule such a long contract planning on firing after his second season of a rebuild. 

Contract length doesn’t matter if the team collapses then firing him may happen. This isn’t like letting a player go and it affecting out cap due to dead cap. 
Rhule having a long contract doesn’t mean he will be immune to being fired. 
Personally I think it will be after his 3rd season the firing talk will happen if we continue to suck. 
I am still hoping for the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Season will not be over, but that would nearly kill most of my hope.

Again I want to win until playoffs are NOT possible, so fug off with the draft talk til then. 

I feel panthers need to come out the barn with wins, cause late season has far less win-a-able games. Panthers could be the start team to win their 9 games and lose the last 8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...