Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Panthers lose to the Jets.....

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, NAS said:

We know we should win but Vegas has us as only a 4 pt favorite which is a very small spread since we’re the home team

Vegas knows how bad and inconsistent the Panthers are. This game is a 50/50 toss up the first week of the season. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Contract length doesn’t matter if the team collapses then firing him may happen. This isn’t like letting a player go and it affecting out cap due to dead cap. 
Rhule having a long contract doesn’t mean he will be immune to being fired. 
Personally I think it will be after his 3rd season the firing talk will happen if we continue to suck. 
I am still hoping for the best. 

The contract was only a small part of what I was saying.  What I was saying is he even offered that long of a contract is because from the start they knew they were starting a rebuild that would probably take more than 2 seasons to see the end result.  If they are really bad this year and draft a qb early and they appear awful the season after that then I could see his seat getting really hot, but right now they haven't even found a qb they are fully behind that they dont think is a project.   Hopefully Sam becomes that but by the investment it seems like they are taking him as a gamble.  Hopefully it pays off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)

Vegas oddsmakers are either going to look like Geniuses or total buffoons tomorrow with that 4-point spread.

I have a feeling it's going to be the latter as the score will not even be close.

This thread will be made irrelevant, imo.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
26 minutes ago, Fred said:

Don’t worry , be excited it’s week one friend . Drink a bud light woof woof and cook up the wings and watch Sam darn old light fires all over the jets . Sometimes pretend that your Sam darnold a team gave up on you and replaced you with a better looking blonde guy that’s sitting in your seat you thought you had and this is the chance to fight his chance to stand up and fight . The better team will win tomorrow. We will find out who we are because it’s unknown but won’t be after tomorrow. Don’t be scared be excited ❤️

You’re great I love you 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...