Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A critique of Darnold through 4 games


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

I remember someone this off-season tryin to tell me that Matt Rhule realized the value a QB has in the sport of football this year after decades of coaching the game, and ever since then I stopped trying to convince anyone about anything on here lol

Edited by Jorgie
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My specific critiques were that he holds the ball too long when he has time because he's slow to process and he's been inaccurate downfield. Those are the two things he needs to improve on to take his game to the next level. Do you disagree?

A "critique" would be fair-minded and balanced.  I didn't hear any commendation for what he does well (like get us back in the ball game in the 4Q with 2 TDs!)  Yes, there were missed connections; yes, he should get the ball out sooner.  Could you use your access to these advanced stats to enlighten us as to his average Release Time.  If it's low-to-mid 30s, then I'd say that mitigates the underlying basis for your criticism (as opposed to a "critique.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're over analyzing this. I think with a better line and more time in the system he will make up more missed plays. Even Tom Brady did some bone head things learning a new system and he still won the SB. Let's fix our legendary bad Oline and then I will talk processing. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice analysis. Typical mouth drooling white knights mucking it up with their triggered responses though.

Sam is solid, and a clear notch above Ted, but his inability to stretch the field will be exposed. Much akin to Bridgewater, when CMAC sat, Teddy’s effectiveness plummeted.

Hes got to start hitting those wide open receivers.

And Joe Brady is goated. He’ll be a HC next year for sure.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My specific critiques were that he holds the ball too long when he has time because he's slow to process and he's been inaccurate downfield. Those are the two things he needs to improve on to take his game to the next level. Do you disagree?

If you're looking at the all-22 in real time I'll concede that point.

Otherwise, like everyone else watching the game on tv, you've no idea what he's looking at. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I've got to ask here:  what the heck is processing?  I've seen it around all over the place this season, and especially in regards to Sam Darnold.  Is there a "best" processor in the league?  How does one improve it?  Is it as much a coaching/scheme issue as a player issue?

For me, what I've seen/read/absorbed is we're talking about the ability to play fast.  To hit your mark, throw the ball to the open guy.  Is that pretty correct?  Like when #11 jumped our RB chip and sacked Sam, he didn't "process" fast enough.

I realize NFL athletes are rare individuals.  But would it be easier to "process" if he had half a second more time?  Or as he gets more time in the offense, will he not "process" faster?  After all, isn't that one thing said about older QBs, how they've "seen everything?"

Sorry, this isn't an only Sam Darnold question, but more of how this processing is evaluated in regards to players and coaches.  As far as Sam - I'm pretty happy with him.  He's not perfect, but well worth the 2nd round pick at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, d-dave said:

OK, I've got to ask here:  what the heck is processing?  I've seen it around all over the place this season, and especially in regards to Sam Darnold.  Is there a "best" processor in the league?  How does one improve it?  Is it as much a coaching/scheme issue as a player issue?

For me, what I've seen/read/absorbed is we're talking about the ability to play fast.  To hit your mark, throw the ball to the open guy.  Is that pretty correct?  Like when #11 jumped our RB chip and sacked Sam, he didn't "process" fast enough.

I realize NFL athletes are rare individuals.  But would it be easier to "process" if he had half a second more time?  Or as he gets more time in the offense, will he not "process" faster?  After all, isn't that one thing said about older QBs, how they've "seen everything?"

Sorry, this isn't an only Sam Darnold question, but more of how this processing is evaluated in regards to players and coaches.  As far as Sam - I'm pretty happy with him.  He's not perfect, but well worth the 2nd round pick at this point.

Quickly going through reads and making a fast, good decision.

The weird thing is that the more time Darnold has the worse he seems to be. He seems to play his best when the defense forces him into making a quick decision. That was kinda my main point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A possible observation is he might not trust the time he's getting?

As in the clock in his head is sped up thinking Jesus somebody's going to strip the ball any second I gotta get it out now.

 

Who knows my guess would be the better we build the line the more everything will slow down for him. Let's hope he grows.

I definitely think he was worth a 2nd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Quickly going through reads and making a fast, good decision.

The weird thing is that the more time Darnold has the worse he seems to be. He seems to play his best when the defense forces him into making a quick decision. That was kinda my main point.

So who is elite as this task?  Is that something that can be taught?  Or is it a scheme/coaching thing?

I have no issue with that you said, I'm just curious about this "processing" thing as a criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, t96 said:

OP is whining again for no reason, as he does a lot

It’s ok to have an opinion and express it and so he did

no need to attack the Op

Darnold has a lot to prove in the NFL. most young QBs do.  

until the panthers decide to fix the oline, it’s probably pointless to critique him 

I was not a fan of the Darnold decision but I give him a ton of credit  

Yesterday was not his best but the number of hits on him add up after awhile 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, d-dave said:

So who is elite as this task?  Is that something that can be taught?  Or is it a scheme/coaching thing?

I have no issue with that you said, I'm just curious about this "processing" thing as a criticism.

Brady, Dak, Rodgers, Burrow

Those guys come to mind immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...