Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

is darnold worse than teddy was?


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Not the first play of the game under no pressure. One of the worst plays I've ever seen. 

You must have started watching football this year then. The play happened in the first couple of min it had little outcome on the game. It was a bad INT yet y’all talk like bad INTs don’t happen to all QBs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Supbro said:

It’s as if INTs aren’t suppose to happen when you play QB

Some are inevitable. You're gonna get hit while throwing sometimes. Balls are gonna get tipped and picked. Sometimes defenders are gonna make some unreal plays.

But damn... most of Darnold's it looks like he's literally targeting the defender.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither will get you to where you’re trying to go. Looks like the QB search will continue. 
 

It was a valiant effort trying to fix Darnold, but it’s looking like he can’t be fixed. These QBs are going to be the undoing of Rhule; as unfortunately, his boss isnt a patient guy. That and the OL.

Edited by AggieLean
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Even on that first int and the scrambles no WR's looked open. Gotta be something on tape that other teams are gonna abuse until coaching genius Brady throws some curveballs in

Yea there were so many times today that it looked like no one was open at all.  No matter how much time Sam had.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Supbro said:

You must have started watching football this year then. The play happened in the first couple of min it had little outcome on the game. It was a bad INT yet y’all talk like bad INTs don’t happen to all QBs.

As a reasonable fan I give Sam one bonehead play a game.  It's gonna happen.  Today our defense made Minnesota look like offensively juggernauts.  They aren't.  The plays to come back and send it into overtime is NOT something OL Teddy two gloves would have made.  He would have checked down three times then force a pass into the end zone. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it this way. You're not winning the SB with Teddy, and you're not winning it with Sam. So what's the point of having either one of them? To have a disappointing season that ends with focusing on the draft? This is QB limbo. Our QB isn't good enough to win trophies, but he's not bad enough to be benched immediately. We can stick with Sam for many years, but we're not winning the SB with him. Not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not looking good for TB. Buffalo and Habs fans are the worst so I will be cheering for the meteor. 
    • Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
×
×
  • Create New...