Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Of all the QBs we might look into, there's one name you should keep on your radar


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Marcus Mariota

https://justblogbaby.com/2021/10/29/raiders-trade-marcus-mariota-nfc/

Man is made of glass, but he's honestly the best (and most likely affordable) QB available on the market for us. 

Discuss - Would you be alright if we brought in one Marcus Mariota?

to do what? I got no problem with bringing him in. Backup? Compete for a job with someone else we bring in?  Play ahead of a promising rookie? Ok. 
 

Making him the only option like Sam?  No thanks.   

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

to do what? I got no problem with bringing him in. Backup? Compete for a job with someone else we bring in?  Play ahead of a promising rookie? Ok. 
 

Making him the only option like Sam?  No thanks.   

Agree, not bringing in any backup/insurance option behind a QB as shaky as Sam was the one real "big mistake" by this front office. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

No. This team has 3 options right now.

1. Draft a QB and hand them the keys

2. Trade for or sign a franchise QB (Rodgers, Wilson, etc.)

3. Trot out PJ Walker or whatever bum we find, and repeat until 1 or 2 is achieved. 

PJ is too much of a gunslinger to lead your to a #1 pick like Clausen.  You would have weeks where it worked out.  What we need to do is just bring Clausen out of retirement.   I mean if you want to tank for #1 you need to get it.  PJ end up giving you the 5 pick or something we draft McCaffrey again or some poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...