Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers….. not an attractive destination for top shelf talent?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/4/2021 at 2:55 PM, PanthersATL said:

Agreed.
We've covered the "market size" conversation in an number of previous threads. Here's one example:

 

Raleigh has actually caught up to Charlotte, only about 50k difference between the two areas. Charlotte fell a spot to 22nd and Raleigh jumped to 24th on recent TV market size. Add them together like the NFL apparently does and it's top 10 in the country I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2021 at 11:01 PM, carpanfan96 said:

Raleigh has actually caught up to Charlotte, only about 50k difference between the two areas. Charlotte fell a spot to 22nd and Raleigh jumped to 24th on recent TV market size. Add them together like the NFL apparently does and it's top 10 in the country I believe. 

I believe that you are correct. NFL market size is different that the regular media market size. The NFL market takes into account the number of households that are part of the base for every game regardless of who the team is playing. I think that in 2016 the Panthers were around the 8th spot. Which makes sense when considering that North Carolina alone is the 9th or 10th most populous state even when not counting South Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...