Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Silver Platter Sam a viable backup QB for Panthers over the long term?


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Is Silver Platter Sam a viable backup QB for Panthers over the long term?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. What say ye?

    • No.
      40
    • Yes.
      17


Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Derek Anderson had been a Pro Bowl QB when we got him.

Sam Darnold was a three time winner of "Worst NFL QB." 

So, how is that even a remotely good comparison? 

It's called  Desperate hope on my birthday But looking at this  way. 

Sam has arm talent and legs.

As a backup he doesn't have the weight of the world on his shoulders so he relaxes when he comes in and we have little drop off.

 

That would be worth a 2nd round pick wouldn't it? If hypothetically he could become a 15yr DA for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

It's called  Desperate hope on my birthday But looking at this  way. 

Sam has arm talent and legs.

As a backup he doesn't have the weight of the world on his shoulders so he relaxes when he comes in and we have little drop off.

 

That would be worth a 2nd round pick wouldn't it? If hypothetically he could become a 15yr DA for us?

No.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

It's called  Desperate hope on my birthday But looking at this  way. 

Sam has arm talent and legs.

As a backup he doesn't have the weight of the world on his shoulders so he relaxes when he comes in and we have little drop off.

 

That would be worth a 2nd round pick wouldn't it? If hypothetically he could become a 15yr DA for us?

That is not even close to worth a second round pick. 

Nor is Darnold anything close to DA.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If there's anyway we can slip out of that 5th year option we need to do it. 

The play we're seeing lately isn't decent backup quality.

Its guaranteed salary so it is tradable.

Only way somebody trades for it is we were to attach an asset to it, NBA style.

What would that take?  A first would probably do it.  A second?  maybe.  A third? I doubt it.

Maybe you attach a player to it, one of these corners we have? Sam and CMC and you get a some picks back? 

I think the most likely outcome is he is on our roster at the beginning of the year.  Either we sign a vet and he is the backup or we draft a guy and he starts as the starter and if he struggles it will be easy for them to transition to the rookie.

In reality the best scenario for the team would be for us to draft a guy, let him sit for a year, and Darnold to play good enough to at least get resigned by another team at the end of this contract and get us some type of comp pick.  Or Darnold plays so bad we get a high draft pick to draft OL to help said rookie that we drafted the year before.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If there's anyway we can slip out of that 5th year option we need to do it. 

The play we're seeing lately isn't decent backup quality.

Nope, since 2018 it's fully guaranteed the minute you pick it up. What a horrible sequence of events. Trade Teddy on Wednesday, pass on Fields on Thursday, and pick up Sams 5th year option on Friday with PJ and Grier as his "competition". Yikes

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is/was a rehabilitation project. You don't rehabilitate someone by plucking them out of a bad situation and then dropping them into an almost identical situation. A rehabilitation probably had more of a shot if Sam had been able to hold a clipboard for a season or two, and not be thrown right back into the fire. It's obvious a lot of his problems are mental, and he needs more work on his mechanics/footwork. Those are things you don't want to fix in-game, during the season as a starting QB. In his current state, he's not a starting QB nor is he backup quality. I hope the coaching staff can salvage him as a backup. Stranger things have happened. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

He is/was a rehabilitation project. You don't rehabilitate someone by plucking them out of a bad situation and then dropping them into an almost identical situation. A rehabilitation probably had more of a shot if Sam had been able to hold a clipboard for a season or two, and not be thrown right back into the fire. It's obvious a lot of his problems are mental, and he needs more work on his mechanics/footwork. Those are things you don't want to fix in-game, during the season as a starting QB. In his current state, he's not a starting QB nor is he backup quality. I hope the coaching staff can salvage him as a backup. Stranger things have happened. 

Yeah, when it comes to rehabbing a QB with Sam's issues, the Panthers have to be the worst case scenario.  He needed to sit behind a vet for at least a year before seeing any gameday action and even then only behind a decent O line w/an experienced OC feeding him the plays.

He has none of that here in Carolina.

What the hell was Rhule and company thinking? 

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

He will be here next year no matter what because of the stupid decision to pick up his option.

Too early to tell whether it is as a starter or backup (please god not starter)

After next season he will be the backup to Teddy on the WFT, then probably out of the NFL.

If you can eat Teddy’s deal….you can eat Sam’s.  Sam being significantly worse and all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is what gives me a glimmer of hope that we may not be tied to Darnold and that $18M next year.

"When a team exercises the option, it becomes guaranteed for injury only. If the player is on the team’s roster at the start of the League Year in his option season, his salary becomes fully guaranteed for skill, cap and injury."

https://frontofficenfl.com/2017/03/27/nfl-rookie-contracts-explained-fifth-year-option/

IF the player is on the team's roster...

Check the date of the article. 2017. Now it’s guaranteed no matter what. 
 

   The real problem with the team exercising it was there was no upside to it. At all. Best case he goes “Tannehill” and they sign him long-term. And his cap hit in the first year would probably be less than the 19M anyway. If Darnold was playing great right now, it still wouldn’t make any sense to have done it. Now, for the 2nd year in a row, they are going to be trying to get a team to pay 2-3M for Darnold to be their backup while the Panthers eat the rest. Just like Teddy. 

  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...