Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some insight into McCaffrey...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Geronimo said:

I disagree.  I think strength has a lot to do with durability and being able to withstand injuries depending on the person.

I'd say there's an obvious correlation to increased athleticism and ligament tears. Ligaments are not built to be that strong, fast, and explosive and it's leading to more non-contact injuries.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

I love the part where they were “concerned” that Cam was getting the dog crap kicked out of him…

But refused then and are still refusing to assemble a group that looks even remotely like an NFL line.

Or even stand up to the officiating crews for looking the other way when Cam was being headhunted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC’s talent was absolutely worth a top pick. They way he was planned on being used was NOT.

Let’s just all imagine for a minute and think about how successful coaches such as Reid, McVay, Belicheck and Payton would utilize a player like CMC, who has already shown to be an elite receiving threat. There is not a snowballs chance in hell those intuitive coaches take CMC and premiere him as a run between the tackles player. They would have had another dime a dozen RB doing that.

Those coaches would’ve had him training in the slot and backfield receiving since day 1, with backfield rushing plays lightly sprinkled in utilizing his finest skills - agility and YAC. Aka Welker, except better potential imo. And that’s saying a lot.

The Panther’s dinosaur coaches had zero ability or innovation to do this or even attempt it. Same concept with Cam. Again, another RB could’ve been getting those tough yards, not your franchise QB.

It’s not Fournette vs CMC because they are completely different players. If you are dumb enough to use them the same or look at them the same you really have no business analyzing the picks at all.

For this inept franchise the pick and extension was certainley a waste.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Captroop said:

Between Cam, Luke, and CMC, it's hard to believe we squandered an opportunity to win a championship with that many generational talents on the roster at the same time.

Been saying this for the longest time. Rivera screwed the pooch with all that talent. To the point that he allowed them to play while being hurt. For what? To save his job? He rode Cam's talent to the ground, which is why i wish i lived in another timeline where we won that 2015 season because after that, it all went down hill super fast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I fully believe that Christian is over training. We saw it before with Beason.

I agree 100% with this. Big muscles but it's the tendons that keep getting damaged. Lighten up on the weights just a bit, get up to around 2% body fat, man. Worry more about your health than your next modelling gig. 

Seriously, though, he is over training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, joemac said:

Heres a crazy idea.  Stop running him up the goddamn gut every single play like hes Earl Campbell or some poo.

On the mind numbingly predictable playcalling I completely agree but as far as utilizing talent if you can't run your 8th overall pick rb up the gut without him breaking you probably shouldn't have drafted him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was all in on team CMC when drafting, thought that someone like him could have won us the Super Bowl had we had him on the team vs. Denver.

That said, extending him, 3 years into a 5 year deal was classic stupidity that has plagued the franchise for decades.  We are a dumb team, always have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole time our front office wanted to "take pressure" off of Cam Newton by drafting oversized WRs, a verstile RB, when all they needed to do to take pressure off was to build Cam and o-line. That's it. That fuggin simple. It's not hard at all. All those wasted assets year after year drafting "luxury" picks like Vernon Fuggin Butler when you should have been spending high draft capital on o-line. And now we seem to be doing the same godamn thing with the new regime. It just never ends. BUILD A MOTHERFUGGIN O-LINE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!!!!!!! Sh*t is just infuriating when our own fans are legit better talent evaluators and team builders than our people that get paid millions to do it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

This whole time our front office wanted to "take pressure" off of Cam Newton by drafting oversized WRs, a verstile RB, when all they needed to do to take pressure off was to build Cam and o-line. That's it. That fuggin simple. It's not hard at all. All those wasted assets year after year drafting "luxury" picks like Vernon Fuggin Butler when you should have been spending high draft capital on o-line. And now we seem to be doing the same godamn thing with the new regime. It just never ends. BUILD A MOTHERFUGGIN O-LINE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!!!!!!! Sh*t is just infuriating when our own fans are legit better talent evaluators and team builders than our people that get paid millions to do it.

Yup after the 2016 blunder that all but completely guaranteed the end of the run with our 2015 core what do we do in 2020? An all defense draft! 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...