Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would you feel if ..


Dory
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, The Huddler said:

sorry Howell is over rated by UNC homers

 

dude had several NFL players on his offense in 2020 and didnt do poo

 

played in the ACC and was underwleming

 

hes also got the game body as baker mayfield..  just pastier, and harrier  

 

Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shocker said:

Not enough to get up to 26…we would have trade next years 1 and more

A trade down first grabbing  Cross who would need to fall and then have Howell fall to round 2 would be nice.  Won’t happen IMO but I can dream

Next years first is going to be a top 5 pick so hell no trading next years first to move back up.  That would be incredibly dumb

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ThPantherFan said:

Honestly, I'd rather trade players for picks, and that's what I think we'll ultimately do if the expectation is to be competitive in 2022.

This would not surprise me. But who besides CMC? Could Burns, DJ, Gross-Matos or Brown be on the block? I think Burns is actually the most likely. He was a Pro-Bowler. He is young. If we resign Reddick and Keep Haynes he may be viewed as the most expendable player that could result in a decent return of draft capital.

But if we are willing to trade a player like Burns (or the others)...what's to keep Rhule and Fit from trading instead for Cousins, Carr, or Jimmy G. Can you imagine those teams with Burns coming off the edge combined with the weapons they already have.....

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dory said:

We stick at 6 and take the best OT (Cross, Ekwonu, Neal)

We trade back into the first round *Pick 26* to get Sam Howell, and give up a 2nd and 3rd next year in the process.

Would you do it?

Don't want Howell, I'm a pass on a QB from a basketball school, he's not impressive to me. From what I can see he's solid / good, but no ''elite'' trait that stands out to me. Seems like a high floor / low ceiling QB. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dory said:

We stick at 6 and take the best OT (Cross, Ekwonu, Neal)

We trade back into the first round *Pick 26* to get Sam Howell, and give up a 2nd and 3rd next year in the process.

Would you do it?

that is no where close to being the approriate future picks to get this year's pick 26.

2022 NFL Trade Value Chart (drafttek.com)

rough numbers here but next years pick are generally valued as this years pick's but one round later.

2nd and 3rd next year would be around a 3rd and 4th this year.  

So,

pick 26 this year = 700

For

Round 2 next year would be like Round 3 this year = 190

Round 3 next year would be like round 4 this year =70

700 vs 260? not happening

 

More realistic 

pick 26 this year = 700

For

Round 1 next year would be like round 2 this year = 420

Round 2 next year would be like round 3 this year = 190

Round 4 this year = 104

700 vs 714

So a more realistic trade would be pick 26 this year for our 2022 4th, 2023 1st, and 2023 2nd.

Also I usually take pick 16 of each round in future years because it is a midpoint pick. I fully realize that a future 1st rounder from us is worth more than say the KC Chiefs but the midpoint is a good starting point.  Teams might adjust slightly depending on hwo bad or good they think you are.  A team is never going to give you full value expecting you to have a top 3 pick.  What if you get lucky and win 7 to 9 games, all of sudden you might be picking around 12.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college. 

it aint about stats.  Howell didnt win a damn thing. If he cant elevate his college team in the ACC he wont elevate the panthers in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Shocker said:

Not enough to get up to 26…we would have trade next years 1 and more

A trade down first grabbing  Cross who would need to fall and then have Howell fall to round 2 would be nice.  Won’t happen IMO but I can dream

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

it aint about stats.  Howell didnt win a damn thing. If he cant elevate his college team in the ACC he wont elevate the panthers in the NFL

There is something to say about talent level of your team, particularly in college. Just saying. Clemson, though not Bama or my alma mater, is going to have markedly more talent than UNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Its pretty apparent to me after reading all of the "trade back" folk's post that they dont comprehend the tru value of having a pick this high in the draft.  Its gold.  Its a chance to get an elite elite player if we dont fug it up (which we most certainly will do)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Yeah I was just stating that a move down could net us a second (and more as you stated) but we would need a QB we like to drop to round 2 with the limited ammo we have in this draft.  I don’t want to touch next years picks in any move back up from round 2 type scenario.

I am thinking we almost have to come out of this draft with a top OL.  We can’t put this off anymore 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...