Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Offensive Line - Is this an improvement?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Campen will make the line better.  No doubt.  Would still be a shock if they were "good".

The big issue is we got through last year without giving adequate time to two draft picks.  We still aren't sure what their ceiling is.  Maybe they already hit their ceiling and Campen won't help.  Maybe they have room to get better.

This proposal says we go into the year with two unknowns and a FA.  We just can't know anything there.

I think we'll look better offensively this year with actual NFL coaches on that side of the ball.  Though it's becoming questionable whether Brady was really the issue.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say--they played the C at G a lot or at C flanked by two mouth-breathing doorknob humpers.  The LT, as a rookie, played 4 OL positions and looked a bit lost a lot.  The RG was on Jenny Craig's deluxe plan and they refused to play him for most of the season.  Our LG is most famous for surrending the hit that ruined Burrow's rookie season.  He was the weakest link on a weak unit in Cincy.  So we really do not know what we have, and Rhule all but admitted that at the combine when he talked about BC--the guy who he has claimed to be a G due to his short arms---playing LT.

Moton balled.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No not really. I don’t care what people say, Elf was horrible and still graded terrible at center. Brown, a possibility but we have no clue. At this point he hasn’t played really at all and can’t be counted as a starter, we don’t even really know if he’s backup material as he was inactive for the majority of the year. We MUST get a vet starter that is proven in the off-season to have any hope at a halfway decent line because we still only have one proven player in Moton. This doesn’t even touch our depth on the line where we have….Erving 😳

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’ll be shocked if Brown is any good. People like to fantasize about rookies who haven’t had a chance but let’s be honest, the round 6 starting offensive line stud is in KC. The odds that Brown joins him are slim to none and there was a medical reason for one drop versus horrific RAS score and Senior Bowl play for the other. I’m worried about BC as well. We’ve seen OL in limited play look good for us but their play hasn’t been dissected by opponents for bad tendencies and weaknesses. We had 11 picks last year and 4-5 should have been used on OL and we spent a 3rd and 6th. Now we are we’re we are hoping both of those are the real deal and hoping we can get a FA fix and that Elflein holds up. Even if that’s our starting OL, I’d be worried about Elflein and Brown holding up for a whole year.

I'm just saying we had opportunities to find out. Christensen should've gotten a lot more time at LT. Brown should've gotten an opportunity to play RG. If the vets are trash you might as well get a look at your rookies, especially once you're mathematically eliminated. We blew a golden opportunity to do just that in a risk free environment. Especially since the QB of the future wasn't even on the roster and the star RB was already on IR. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

I agree but I think people put Brown on a pedestal because he had some great highlights of running over guys half his weight. For BC, at his age, yeah he should be expected to start and be ready. I’m actually willing to side with Rhule on Brown.

I know you saw his play at the Senior Bowl. Forget our atrocious OL play, do you honestly think Brown would be ready to play this year?

I don't think anyone is putting him on a pedestal. He's just an unknown. An unknown is better than known trash.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

I agree but I think people put Brown on a pedestal because he had some great highlights of running over guys half his weight. For BC, at his age, yeah he should be expected to start and be ready. I’m actually willing to side with Rhule on Brown.

I know you saw his play at the Senior Bowl. Forget our atrocious OL play, do you honestly think Brown would be ready to play this year?

If you put Brown next to Elflein, the pass rush up the middle will resemble what was there last year. May be a decent straight ahead run blocker, but NFL DTs will abuse his lack of agility and that will fade as well. His hype was in hoping he committed to changing his body and getting in shape for once. That hasn’t happened. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s the same OL, with BC having a little experience which should upgrade the LT spot, the FA should dramatically upgrade the LG, Elf and Moton are the same and Brown can’t possibly be worse that what we had at RG last year. Should be a big upgrade IMO. BC will be the biggest X Factor and give us a solid OL if he is capable. We could probably draft another OG on the 4th/5th to compete with Brown and provide a little depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...