Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

From observer’s Willis & Alexander why Panthers declined Watson contract demand


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

 Watson seems like an extremely low character egotistical douche. I’m disappointed it took so long and so many ridiculous demands for the Panthers to grow a backbone and stop letting themselves get played.

Hate my Browns got sucked in....but Browns gonna brown..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

They stole my theory…lol. Well put it out there first not stole. But this was one of many reasons to not do this deal. 
 

Was Watson willing to change his entire social life. Not massages. Clubs or any partying where you can be accused of something and any picture from the wrong angle and a just ONE woman who wants some money, and the Panthers are stuck in this mess with a lot more money at stake. I don’t know what Ben R. did, and I’ve thought he was a D-bag before the accusations, but he got married to a Dr. and never put himself in the position to be accused again. Is Watson going today to do that in CLE. Edit: And there is no telling what any womens rights groups might have planned. Maybe nothing. I have no clue. But it’s 2022 and I would never speak for what matters to anyone else. 

 

  Add that to injury risk(like any player) and he could easily get pissed and pull this crap again on his new team. 
 

  This year is basically shot if he gets suspended for 8 games. In a division with the Bengals, Ravens and Steelers it’s hard to imagine contending with him out half the year. 
 

  The theory that Tepper would let him pick the next HC. Didn’t believe that, although please hire Brian Flores and get the Steelers two extra 3rds. He’s a very good/great player but that’s crazy. His resume isn’t loaded with rational decisions and it’s ridiculous to give a player control. Just sign the team over to him. 
 

If someone said would you give Watson 5/230M guaranteed before any of his off - field issues, is it an immediate yes? More than Mahomes or anyone? Even if you say well, ok, we can build around him. Whoa? Not so fast. You also lose the 5 best resources to help with that building. And possibly a valuable resource you already have. How about now? The Panthers were fortunate someone came to their senses They seem to be doing well in FA. Just keep making good decisions and the wins will come. 

I think the concern was the NFL could hold of on his suspension until after his civil trial which could take a couple of years. It's possible he could be suspended multiple games or indefinitely depending on the outcome and 150m for 3 years against the cap with no way to recover it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fan01 said:

I don't believe this for a second.

I do. 
 

I was listening to PFT today and it was recorded before the trade went down. They were talking about Von Miller and his 6-year deal. They weren’t talking about Watson at all. What they said was this…All NFL contracts get a guaranteed max of 2 years. That’s it. If you’re a superstar you MAY get 3-4 years. Take CMC for example. He is/was a superstar when he signed a 4-year $64 million contract. How much for each year? Answer: $16mil. How much guaranteed? Answer: $38 mil. 
 

That is roughly 2-1/3 years of guaranteed money. Basically exactly what PFT said.

Watson was asking for DOUBLE the amount of guarantee a normal SUPERSTAR player gets….and he has to sit out. AND…if he gets suspended or something else comes out on him. He’s owed every dime of that contract regardless. That is plainly INSANE. 
 

Tepper did his homework for a year+ on this player. PIs and all. He wanted him. If he wasn’t comfortable making those guarantees then truthfully…nobody should have been. Period. We’ll see how it plays out. Maybe bc it’s The Browns…Bur I just think it plays out badly. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I think the concern was the NFL could hold of on his suspension until after his civil trial which could take a couple of years. It's possible he could be suspended multiple games or indefinitely depending on the outcome and 150m for 3 years against the cap with no way to recover it. 

Could be another valid reason. I haven’t followed it enough to know. I was going under the assumption they would be settled before the season. And if they aren’t, we have to wonder what sort of protests could come?  If any at all?  So many variables that could wreck this. And how does a HC even speak to him? The coach pisses him off in any way and guess who’s leaving? Not the QB with the guaranteed contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unicar15 said:

I do. 
 

I was listening to PFT today and it was recorded before the trade went down. They were talking about Von Miller and his 6-year deal. They weren’t talking about Watson at all. What they said was this…All NFL contracts get a guaranteed max of 2 years. That’s it. If you’re a superstar you MAY get 3-4 years. Take CMC for example. He is/was a superstar when he signed a 4-year $64 million contract. How much for each year? Answer: $16mil. How much guaranteed? Answer: $38 mil. 
 

That is roughly 2-1/3 years of guaranteed money. Basically exactly what PFT said.

Watson was asking for DOUBLE the amount of guarantee a normal SUPERSTAR player gets….and he has to sit out. AND…if he gets suspended or something else comes out on him. He’s owed every dime of that contract regardless. That is plainly INSANE. 
 

Tepper did his homework for a year+ on this player. PIs and all. He wanted him. If he wasn’t comfortable making those guarantees then truthfully…nobody should have been. Period. We’ll see how it plays out. Maybe bc it’s The Browns…Bur I just think it plays out badly. 

It's pretty crazy, aside from the Browns taking on the extra guaranteed money, the fact that Watson tacked on the bonus money so he'd get paid during suspension is just dark. Makes me think he knows he's gonna look bad in the civil trials and the NFL is gonna be in a really awkward position. All that BIg Ben stuff went down way before everyone had Twitter and he still got 6 games 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's pretty crazy, aside from the Browns taking on the extra guaranteed money, the fact that Watson tacked on the bonus money so he'd get paid during suspension is just dark. Makes me think he knows he's gonna look bad in the civil trials and the NFL is gonna be in a really awkward position. All that BIg Ben stuff went down way before everyone had Twitter and he still got 6 games 

My speculation:  The bonus money was done for several reasons.

1) it changed his cap hit this year to a much lower number since the bonus will be split across the length of the contract for cap reasons.  I doubt the browns could fit him under the cap without at least some restructuring since Mayfield still is under his 5th year option. 

2) as you said, watson is protecting himself from losing large sums if and when he is suspended by having a much lower salary.  This does seem unfair as he is getting rewarded for this whole mess he is in.

3) I'm pretty sure the restructure bonus will be paid immediately as a huge lump sum.  Around 50m I believe.  Anybody would rather get that upfront rather than doled out in a regular salary.

 

Edited by w280sax
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, w280sax said:

My speculation:  The bonus money was done for several reasons.

1) it changed his cap it this year to a much lower number since the bonus will be split across the length of the contract for cap reasons.  I doubt the browns could fit him under the cap without at least some restructuring since Mayfield still is under his 5th year option. 

2) as you said, watson is protecting himself from losing large sums if and when he is suspended by having a much lower salary.  This does seem unfair as he is getting rewarded for this whole mess he is in.

3) I'm pretty sure the restructure bonus will be paid immediately as a huge lump sum.  Around 50m I believe.  Anybody would rather get that upfront rather than doled out in a regular salary.

 

He better throw Case Keenum some extra cash on the side for starting the first half of the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find it funny that Watson claimed LOYALTY was so important to him, and then demanded a trade because the Texans weren't LOYAL to their word on their Coaching search. Watson then spurns the one team that stayed LOYAL in their pursuit of him. To top it all off, Watson reached out to Atlanta who hadn't made any attempt to that point, gotta love that LOYALTY!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...