Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Would Have Been Your Reaction?

The Huddler

By The Huddler,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What if we sign Armstead? 

Paying big money to a guy who has never played a full 16 games or even 15 games in his 9 year NFL career (and only 8 games last year), while playing one of the most physical positions in football would be an absolute disaster. I'm sure Rhule would do it though

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Rhule Mentor

Panthers Rhule

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Lets say we won the Watson sweepstakes..

 

What would have been your honest reaction and opinion on giving Watson 230 million dollars fully guaranteed? 

 

 

 

 

Saddened. I would have to admit that I was wrong and I would change my name.

19 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What if we sign Armstead? 

I'm not a fan of this one. I'm hoping we WERE in because of Watson. I don't think this would be a good signing. It's imagining potential again. He only plays half a season. If we were a playoff team and I thought I could have him there then yes but for us? I don't like it. 

But it does depend on the contract. 

Edited by Panthers Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stuart Smith Mentor

Stuart Smith

Posted
Posted

Watson realizes how much of the public perceives him, he realizes he possibly will never make any money from endorsements. I would have been very disappointed had the Panthers gave him that regardless of pending litigation. He is 28 and 25 lifetime. Kirk Cousins is 61W 62L and 2 ties in his career. One person cannot do it by himself. My opinion is that a lot of incentives should be tied to a $40 million dollar a year contract,  however it’s not my money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...