Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orlovsky: Pickett doesn’t have anything that isn’t coachable


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I'm as uncertain on Pickett as the next guy but this is a silly take. 

Translation: there's nothing special about Pickett that should warrant a sixth pick. He's not a QB whose shoulders the team can stand upon when the going gets tough. When he meets another playoff-caliber team with a superior QB, that's the end of the line.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2005 Draft San Francisco picks Alex Smith first. Green Bay drafts Aaron Rodgers #24.

The Panthers are the 49ers if they do this Kenny Pickett thing they've been telegraphing for two years. If you go with consistency (2yrs at 70%completion), accuracy, measurables 6'4", toughness (against doctors advice played full contact football and put up 4186yrds 36tds 8int,) hobbled while healing. Big time accurate arm. It's not Pickett at #6. San Francisco would love to have that one back.

Guess who Aaron Rodgers is this draft? Carson Strong 2022!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

2005 Draft San Francisco picks Alex Smith first. Green Bay drafts Aaron Rodgers #24.

The Panthers are the 49ers if they do this Kenny Pickett thing they've been telegraphing for two years. If you go with consistency (2yrs at 70%completion), accuracy, measurables 6'4", toughness (against doctors advice played full contact football and put up 4186yrds 36tds 8int,) hobbled while healing. Big time accurate arm. It's not Pickett at #6. San Francisco would love to have that one back.

Guess who Aaron Rodgers is this draft? Carson Strong 2022!

Lol do you personally know Carson Strong or something? I love your dedication to the man. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

And Joe Burrow…

Or Drew Brees...

It's basically buying into the notion that if someone is a physical freak, you can easily teach them how to be a great pro quarterback.

Except that's not really true, and more than one team has made big draft mistakes by adhering to that philosophy.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, t96 said:

That’s also true about Tom Brady though in theory.

Not really unless he just means physical traits. I don’t think it’s possible to teach the dog and clutch that Brady has. You either have that or you don’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Or Drew Brees...

It's basically buying into the notion that if someone is a physical freak, you can easily teach them how to be a great pro quarterback.

Except that's not really true, and more than one team has made big draft mistakes by adhering to that philosophy.

Yea that's what frustrates me about these takes.  A lot of the best qbs dont have anything physically elite.   The most important part of being a qb is between the ears.  Second to that is accuracy.  Neither of those show up as elite physical traits or exciting flashy ideas but it's the truth.   So to say those things can be coached, especially making quick decisions etc. Is ridiculous,  some of the stuff between the ears cant be coached any more than running fast or throwing it far.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Translation: there's nothing special about Pickett that should warrant a sixth pick. He's not a QB whose shoulders the team can stand upon when the going gets tough. When he meets another playoff-caliber team with a superior QB, that's the end of the line.

Pretty much this. He'll be a serviceable game manager. I won't make any predictions about his being able to protect the football because I'm really skeptical about his hands (not the hand width, but the reason for it...he's got issues with his thumb). But he's a guy that if you have the team built up around him, he won't be the reason you lose. 

He'll be an upgrade over what we've had the last couple years, but he'll peak earlier than the other QBs available....which is good if you're a HC on a short leash. You just won't see much beyond that. Higher floor, lower ceiling than the other top options.

All that said, not my first or second choice from this class.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Lol do you personally know Carson Strong or something? I love your dedication to the man. 

I'm on a QB bandwagon every season. Usually the guy nobody is talking about or trying to move heaven and earth to get. Just the stats none of the hype. It was Justin Herbert(OROY), Kyle Trask, now Carson Strong.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...