Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Pauline: people in league circles believe that the #Panthers will select LT Charles Cross


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

If we don't draft Pickett then I won't be mad if we get an LT. We need one or the other. If we do go LT then I wonder if we would try to make a deal for Baker?

9 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

This is interesting. These players should be players unavailable in the 4th round. It implies the possibility of a trade down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just have this feeling we'll go defense in the first again. Can't shake it. There's been way too much talk about offensive players. Same thing happened last year. I don't think they can help themselves. At least Rhule can't. Hopefully someone else is running the show this year 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I just have this feeling we'll go defense in the first again. Can't shake it. There's been way too much talk about offensive players. Same thing happened last year. I don't think they can help themselves. At least Rhule can't. Hopefully someone else is running the show this year 

You may very well be right. And looking at how our defense just completely fell apart after the Dallas game, a strong case could be made for the best edge or LB available.

Still, I want to see us grab the best O-line player available at 6.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Penning?? I think you are going to see that definitely isn't true.

Cross perhaps but not Penning.

I’m telling you—Penning may be the target honestly. Sewell, Mac, and Fields we’re all the hype last year and people only caught wind of our Horn/Surtain love a week or so before the draft, I’m telling you Cross is as high as #5 overall on some boards and as low as the 5th OL. Bottom line is Neal/Cross is not a top-2 and then the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Who were people in league circles saying we were going to draft last year?

Actually, if I remember correctly the census around pretty much everyone was either Horn or Fields if Sewell was gone, mainly Horn, with some smaller whispers of Surtain and a random Smiths here and there…and that pretty much happened.

Granted that was much closer than draft time than around this time.

But seeing as this will be the third year in a row the Panthers have a top 10 pick, that isn’t surprising, most mocks worth their salt, closer to draft time, generally nail the top 5 and often 7/8 of the top 10 picks/moves of the draft.

Which makes sense as they’re the easiest.

 

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I just have this feeling we'll go defense in the first again. Can't shake it. There's been way too much talk about offensive players. Same thing happened last year. I don't think they can help themselves. At least Rhule can't. Hopefully someone else is running the show this year 

I have this gut feeling all the top OL will get picked ahead of us, especially since there are no QBs worth top 10 picks and one of the top DL will fall to us. It won’t be a tragedy since our DL needs just as much help as the OL but I still would prefer one of these OTs.

Edited by firefox1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cross is my #1 OT this year, so I'd love this pick. I do think we'd take Neal or Ekwonu over him if either are there at our pick, though. I just think Cross is the best pass protector in this class.

That said, we certainly could opt for a QB. The thing there is if we pick Willis it still won't help us much this year at QB, so we'd still be in the market for a veteran QB or stuck with Darnold.

Can you even imagine how the fan base will be clamoring for Willis if Darnold is the starter to begin the year? My lord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, saX man said:

I’m telling you—Penning may be the target honestly. Sewell, Mac, and Fields we’re all the hype last year and people only caught wind of our Horn/Surtain love a week or so before the draft, I’m telling you Cross is as high as #5 overall on some boards and as low as the 5th OL. Bottom line is Neal/Cross is not a top-2 and then the rest.

I am not sure where you are getting your info from but it definitely doesn't seem to match up with many of the anonymous quotes from scouts that are being reported. 

I don't disagree that there will definitely be differences in various teams boards but I don't think you are gonna have many(if any) teams with Penning over Neal or Ekwonu. 

And I like Penning but he is definitely a lesser version of a guy like Ekwonu specifically. 

Not that I would be upset if we took Penning but I probably would if it's over Neal and Ekwonu. I wouldn't necessarily love it if it were over Cross, either. 

I can see the argument for Cross over Penning and vice versa. I just like Cross as a much more polished pass protector versus the much less polished mauler that Penning is.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cross had stayed in college another year, he may have been the top tackle drafted in 2023. The meteoric rise is because he is already so good and has plenty of room to improve. You draft based on potential and he has more than the other tackle prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not sure where you are getting your info from but it definitely doesn't seem to match up with many of the anonymous quotes from scouts that are being reported. 

I don't disagree that there will definitely be differences in various teams boards but I don't think you are gonna have many(if any) teams with Penning over Neal or Ekwonu. 

And I like Penning but he is definitely a lesser version of a guy like Ekwonu specifically. 

Not that I would be upset if we took Penning but I probably would if it's over Neal and Ekwonu. I wouldn't necessarily love it if it were over Cross, either. 

I can see the argument for Cross over Penning and vice versa. I just like Cross as a much more polished pass protector versus the much less polished mauler that Penning is.

Thing is, I'd say Penning's Pass-pro is better than Icky so then considering his upside and general size/length, it makes you wonder if its a situation like 2020.  It really depends on scheme and what certain teams covet.

I.E.--Thomas was commonly projected behind Wills and Wirfs, taken way higher and then even Becton (The high upside large mauler type) taken ahead of Wirfs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...