Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mel Kiper Mock Draft-We pick a QB. Pickett goes to the Steelers.


NCTHFL0567
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If there is one thing the sports industry has taught me. You can be absolutely atrocious at your job and you will still keep said job. 
Wish that worked in the real world. 

He's kept his job because people still tune in to hear what he has to say. And in fairness, while he is rarely right on the order drafted, he does provide valuable analysis of each player.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we draft a QB, aren't we essentially giving Matt Rhule more time at the helm?  You can't draft a rookie QB and expect quicker results than an established QB, a la the Teddy and Sam experiments.  That said, the thought of Rhule getting his hands on a raw QB only to be fired shortly thereafter gives me bad vibes for the kid's development.  fug it all. 

 

tldr - pick a tackle for fugs sake

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often does Mel Kiper get it right?
 
Hardly the case. A little internet research turns up this gem from coldhardfootballfacts.com; over the course of the last four drafts (2005-2008) our boy Mel has compiled an abysmal record of 32 correct picks out of 127 in the first round or about 25.2 percent correct.
 
Who is the most accurate mock draft person?
 
With so many opinions, not everyone can be right. However, one particular writer from Sharp Football Analysis is statistically proven to be the most accurate mock drafter over the last five years. According to The Reports,  Brendan Donahue is that writer. He has a 44.8 average over the last five years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chaos said:

If we draft a QB, aren't we essentially giving Matt Rhule more time at the helm?  You can't draft a rookie QB and expect quicker results than an established QB, a la the Teddy and Sam experiments.  That said, the thought of Rhule getting his hands on a raw QB only to be fired shortly thereafter gives me bad vibes for the kid's development.  fug it all. 

 

tldr - pick a tackle for fugs sake

This is why it would smart of Rhule to select a quarterback...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...