Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I took from the Fitterer presser.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

This dumbass is going to trade our pick for pennies on the dollar just to make up for his past shitty mistake.   My hate for this organization grows by the second

Our pick is worth nothing because there's nobody that wants to trade into the top 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zod said:

They are all in on trading down. Much of what he said was posturing for the best offer possible. 2 QBs worthy of the 6th pick? That was the tell. He went too far by saying something so silly.  

I personally found it humorous that told Sam that and Sam was ‘fine with it’

$18.5 reasons to be ‘fine with it’

not sure why Fitterer felt it necessary to give that info….I mean, no other team wants Darnold and his salary is guaranteed 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, poundaway said:

Getting two firsts would be nice.

Getting both of those 1sts would require us throwing in a player piece. The problem is we don’t really have great depth at any position unless we’re considering trading CMC. If you trade CMC you’d be dumb to draft one of these rookie QBs. He’s basically their only chance of succeeding. So….not sure how we get two 1sts.

 

If you do the points we’re about 350 points off the Eagles two 1st round picks. That’s a mid-second round pick. So question is do you start dealing picks next year in order to move down and acquire picks this year? 

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

Yea there’s no reason to lie this time of year…

Everyone’s got it figured out 

I disagree. Especially with this draft where there is no clear cut number 1 player..

Or a number 1 QB ... I truly feel nobody has a clue of what the top 5 teams will do and that's why it's essential to keep your plans hidden and lie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zod said:

They are all in on trading down. Much of what he said was posturing for the best offer possible. 2 QBs worthy of the 6th pick? That was the tell. He went too far by saying something so silly.  

If Evan Neal is there all that is over….he will be the guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

This dumbass is going to trade our pick for pennies on the dollar just to make up for his past shitty mistake.   My hate for this organization grows by the second

when has he ever made a draft trade for pennies on the dollar? sounds like you’re hating just for the sake of hating.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

I personally found it humorous that told Sam that and Sam was ‘fine with it’

$18.5 reasons to be ‘fine with it’

not sure why Fitterer felt it necessary to give that info….I mean, no other team wants Darnold and his salary is guaranteed 

He has no choice but to be fine with it.   After this year he will never be a starter again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

Getting both of those 1sts would require us throwing in a player piece. The problem is we don’t really have great depth at any position unless we’re considering trading CMC. If you trade CMC you’d be dumb to draft one of these rookie QBs. He’s basically their only chance of succeeding. So….not sure how we get two 1sts.

 

If you do the points we’re about 350 points off the Eagles two 1st round picks. That’s a mid-second round pick. So question is do you start dealing picks next year in order to move down and acquire picks this year? 

Yeah I know.  Teams are willing to eat SOME points to get THE player they want but they aren't going to eat  350 points.  We'd have to give up picks next year or have a intermediate trade before 15 hoping a different  team will eat some of those points first, which is how many of us play it in the mock draft.   Its possible, but not realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

He has no choice but to be fine with it.   After this year he will never be a starter again. 

I know of no true number one  qb in the nfl who would be fine with it

  If he is, and if what Scott F described is true, he is not someone iId ever want as  my number one option at qb   These guys are supposed to be leaders   

his money is guaranteed whether he is fine with it or not however and that’s also part of the problem but we all know this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seemed obvious from the start.  Reich was fired because he pushed back on the QB. Wanted Bryce to sit behind Andy. Pretty sure.  Where I differ from a lot of people is that I never felt like Canales’ situation was dependent on successfully developing Bryce. I thought that was unreasonable and if he failed with Bryce it should be on Bryce and not on Canales, and he should get a chance with another QB. But that is not as good a bet as thinking the both of them were hired with the condition that Bryce had to be given every opportunity.  That seems a given.    I tell you, if Canales can make Bryce into even an average starter he is a miracle worker and should be in the QB coaching HOF. 
    • I've been saying this for quite a while. There a pattern involved in all the transactions and camp/season activity that doesn't make sense unless you factor in than the GM/coach have been overruled from above.  I remember that during the hiring process it was widely rumored that Bryce had to be the guy as part of the hiring process and him staying there was a condition. Whether that's true or not, who knows for certain, but it does fall in line with a lot of the moves we've made regarding our QB room over the last 3 off seasons. 
    • Speak of the underachieving devil. Front page on the ESPN NFL section. https://www.espn.com/nfl/  
×
×
  • Create New...