Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers will attack with CMC, despite potential injury potential (Reed)


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Smithers said:

Yeah I seem to remember stew being on a bike on the sidelines more than he was on the field 

Stew's ankle never fully healed...ever.  He could have been all time Panther, but his lower half just kept plaguing him.  Incredible skillset.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK so I've got the 2nd pick in my fantasy draft this year and it's basically down to CMC, Jonathan Taylor or King Henry as my pick. The league winner had Taylor last year so I'm assuming he's the first pick. It's a PPR league, which is where CMC would feast. But I know I will get absolutely roasted by the rest of the league if I homer out and take him #2 given the injury history (none of that matters and a huge "I told you so" if he can make it a full season of course)

Vhat to do Vhat to do.... A lot rides on that pick. What say you, Huddle homer sages? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PizzaTheHutt said:

OK so I've got the 2nd pick in my fantasy draft this year and it's basically down to CMC, Jonathan Taylor or King Henry as my pick. The league winner had Taylor last year so I'm assuming he's the first pick. It's a PPR league, which is where CMC would feast. But I know I will get absolutely roasted by the rest of the league if I homer out and take him #2 given the injury history (none of that matters and a huge "I told you so" if he can make it a full season of course)

Vhat to do Vhat to do.... A lot rides on that pick. What say you, Huddle homer sages? 

I would take him, but that's just me. He's so valuable in a PPR.

Hell, I think even with him missing almost all of last year he was still the 22nd ranked back fantasy wise....something like that.  He's a gamebreaker in FF.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced that CMC could not have played through most of those injuries.  I feel like the team shut him down because they knew we were not competing for anything and RBs have limited time to play at an elite level.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PizzaTheHutt said:

OK so I've got the 2nd pick in my fantasy draft this year and it's basically down to CMC, Jonathan Taylor or King Henry as my pick. The league winner had Taylor last year so I'm assuming he's the first pick. It's a PPR league, which is where CMC would feast. But I know I will get absolutely roasted by the rest of the league if I homer out and take him #2 given the injury history (none of that matters and a huge "I told you so" if he can make it a full season of course)

Vhat to do Vhat to do.... A lot rides on that pick. What say you, Huddle homer sages? 

Dont ever draft running backs in the first.  ever.  full stop.  I would go with Kelce simply because there are like 5 tes that contribute consistently in fantasy and having the top dog means you are getting points basically every game.  There are plenty of running backs that emerge every year and the wideout depth is just getting crazier by the year.  At 2 I would go Kelce or Jefferson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2022 at 3:58 PM, Carl Spackler said:

"Panthers will [do something stupid], despite [reasonable risk or concern"

- by any author at any time during Matt Rhule's tenure

Can blame a lot of things on Rhule, but he is not the one that kept handing the ball off the McCaffrey when games were over that would be his predecessor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jtm said:

I'm not convinced that CMC could not have played through most of those injuries.  I feel like the team shut him down because they knew we were not competing for anything and RBs have limited time to play at an elite level.  

 

100%. Two years ago he was good to go in early December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, PizzaTheHutt said:

OK so I've got the 2nd pick in my fantasy draft this year and it's basically down to CMC, Jonathan Taylor or King Henry as my pick. The league winner had Taylor last year so I'm assuming he's the first pick. It's a PPR league, which is where CMC would feast. But I know I will get absolutely roasted by the rest of the league if I homer out and take him #2 given the injury history (none of that matters and a huge "I told you so" if he can make it a full season of course)

Vhat to do Vhat to do.... A lot rides on that pick. What say you, Huddle homer sages? 

I’m facing the same dilemma. I’ve got the #3 pick and it’ll probably be between CMC or Ekeler. I’ve had CMC the past couple of years and he’s absolutely killed me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...