Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final predictions for the season?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Being weak against the run is exacerbated by having a bad offense. If the opposing team gets a lead, it allows them to focus on running out the clock. Our secondary should be opportunistic this year and we should be able to stop teams from playing catch-up. Season will come down to our ability to score and score quickly. The coaching staff wanting to focus on being a run first team is going to be detrimental to our success. In a ground and pound competition we will lose.  6-11. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a popular opinion I know, but I think the players are responding to Rhule. They genuinely seem to like playing together and I don't really think there are any bad actors in the locker room.

The Offensive line is definitely improved and there's a new OC and a new QB.

The defense is a year older and there seems to be more depth on the Defensive line. Luvu, Wilson, and Littleton are solid, and then there's Shaq.

The secondary is a strength.

The Special teams have a new coordinator and they did a good job in coverage during the preseason. Robert's is a professional return man. Hekker is an all pro.

There are a lot of young guys that will need to develop quickly to make up for lack of depth, and there will be a learning curve as everyone on offense gets used to each other and McAdoo's system, so a slow start is likely but the early games on the schedule will be easier.

TB has Oline trouble, NO a new coach, and Atlanta is, well you know.

I think 9+ wins is a real possibility. 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big caveat that follows 32 teams is Barring Injuries, I have us somewhere between 6 and 10 wins.  So split the difference and call it 8-9.

If Brady starts playing like he is 45 or is a victim of the above caveat, that actually could be good enough to win the division.

Edited by Sgt Schultz
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 Winnable Games: Browns (wo Watson),2x Atlanta, Seattle, Giants, Steelers, Lions

Potential Upsets: 2xSaints, Cards, Broncos, Ravens, 9ers (which QB?)

Major Upsets: 2xBucs, Rams, Bengals (superbowl hangover?)

An INJURED Baker had 8 more touchdowns than Sam, we lost 6 games alone by less than a score.

I'm putting the Homer goggles on.

This is a 10 win team, and if things click 12 wins.

Key pieces (Baker, Horn, Shaq) go down for significan time, all bets are off. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...