Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does 0-2 put Rhule’s seat red hot?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

There may be a possible bond between Rhule and Tepper that extends beyond the grid iron which might provide him a longer leash than most would have in this situation..... and as long as the NFL marketing machine and the Panthers continue to increase Tepper's return on investment it may continue to extend this professional relationship longer than most of you would care for................and that's all I'll say on the subject.  

 

 

 

Edited by PghPanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2022 at 8:50 AM, CRA said:

no NFL coach just gets 4-7 years.  You still have to earn it. 

the stadiums will empty, the season tickets they so want to bump the price on won't sell, etc. 

 

The lion's share of the NFL owners return on investment isn't driven by the lemming fans.............Covid empty stands should have made that clear .........nobody was in attendance then and yet their team values still increased.........

Folks the world is a conjob.........ask the bankers..........and for the most part so are pro and big time college sports........anywhere there is big money there is the big con.

"You really don't know someone until you deal with their money"  - Ben Franklin 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2022 at 11:30 PM, Coreyl90 said:

Should be, but nothing will happen. Rhule is still owed like $43 million. I doubt David Tepper would piss 43 million away for sake of potentially winning some football games. I am afraid we're stuck with him so we might as well grit our teeth, support the team, and weather the storm. 

 He already pissed away 62 million by hiring Rhule.

I would also point out that "winning some football games" is the number one goal of having a team. Supporting a team that doesn't do that would be pretty goofy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not understand those saying he gets a few extra years due to his contract.  I mean, eating $8m per year is not as bad as losing for 10 years as a team--what that does to ticket sales, merchandising, the brand, etc.  If we lose 10 games this season, time to move on.--if not sooner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2022 at 11:30 PM, Coreyl90 said:

Should be, but nothing will happen. Rhule is still owed like $43 million. I doubt David Tepper would piss 43 million away for sake of potentially winning some football games. I am afraid we're stuck with him so we might as well grit our teeth, support the team, and weather the storm. 

Or just stop wasting our time watching this dumpster fire of a team, stop wasting our money buying merchandise or at bars watching them, and probably feel happier and less stressed until changes are made...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2022 at 9:30 PM, Coreyl90 said:

Should be, but nothing will happen. Rhule is still owed like $43 million. I doubt David Tepper would piss 43 million away for sake of potentially winning some football games. I am afraid we're stuck with him so we might as well grit our teeth, support the team, and weather the storm. 

The money is a sunk cost. He brought Rhule here to build a winning culture and team and if that isn't happening and continues to look unlikely as it does now, then he's only losing money (such as from fans etc) and more importantly a chance at success by keeping him.  If he's committed to winning then it doesn't matter what he's paying him really.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...