Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TOUGH QUESTION OF THE NIGHT: Name one area on the team that has improved under Rhule


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Panthercougar68 said:

On paper WR and corner. We really never had a group like this under Ron.

Corner I agree but WR is questionable. Sure the talent on paper is there but last  year Robby’s numbers were comical and we aren’t really lighting up the stat sheet at WR through the first two games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

defense played well, secondary is the best we’ve had in a while. ron didn’t believe in DBs. OL is the best we’ve had in a long time. people bitched for years that we didn’t address the LT. now we did, and people still bitch. don’t give me the crap about how he sucks. he’s played well for a rookie in one of the more difficult positions on the field. look at how well BC has developed. now extrapolate that to icky + BC, and the OL is solid.

Edited by Mother Grabber
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

I think the team is overall better. They just can’t seal the deal in crucial moments. It feels like a good team with a case of the yips. 

Fun fact the most horrendous, pathetic teams ever fielded in nfl histories with records from 0-3 wins actually averaged about eight games where the final score was one score or less.

8 games. That’s half the season. That’s average - sometimes it was more than that.

the 2008 0-16 Lions were literally the worst team in history and 6 games were one scores.

point being….close doesn’t mean dog poo in the nfl. all games are more or less close in the grand scheme of things. even the greatest coaches of all time don’t average an eye popping winning %.

who cares if Rhule ‘comes close’ it doesn’t mean poo and never will

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Care to elaborate why you disagree? We kicked the ball off 3 times and we kept the Browns to starting field position of the 22, 27, and 10 (would have been 21 before a penalty). All 3 of those are successes with the modern kickoff rule.
    • Its August so obviously quality options are not there. The question is whether any improvement can be made to the bottom of the depth chart.
    • NFL has a huge amount of parity.  The talent level between most NFL starters outside of the top 5 to 10 guys at a position is very comparable.  2020 worst teams Jacksonville Jaguars - 1-15 (worst record in NFL) New York Jets - 2-14 Cincinnati Bengals - 4-11-1 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 Houston Texans - 4-12 Carolina Panthers - 5-11 Detroit Lions - 5-11 Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11-1 Los Angeles Chargers - 7-9 Denver Broncos - 5-11 2024 Worst teams New York Giants - 3-14 (tied for worst) Cleveland Browns - 3-14 (tied for worst) Tennessee Titans - 3-14 (tied for worst) New England Patriots - 4-13 Carolina Panthers - 5-12 Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-13 Las Vegas Raiders - 4-13 New York Jets - 5-12 Chicago Bears - 5-12 Arizona Cardinals - 8-9 Bengals, Texans, Lions, Eagles, Broncos and the Jags have all made the the playoffs in the last 3 years. What I'm saying is it's stupid to argue when team is the worst when there is so much parity and the system allows quick turnarounds.    
×
×
  • Create New...