Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason to keep Robbie Anderson after this year?


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Damn it.   Makes me hate fitt and Hurley even more.   No good reason to extend either of the two. 
 

so we have to wait until the off season to trade cmac?

Yep. And it still costs about 19M then. Which should go well with the 20M hole that’s already been dug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way you trade CMAC for a first. He is the Panthers at this point. The man can do it all and you wanna give him up for another Derrick Brown?  Our roster isn't terrible. Seems like Snow is making our defense look worse than it should be and we are only an offensive line away from having a manageable offense if we had a decent Head Coach.

Edited by Cam Lawter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Robbie personally but as far as production goes it's common sense he is not what we had hoped for and if not for the Temple connection we never would have brought him in at all. I remember when we thought wide receiver was going to be a strength for the first time in many years. We do have some talent there but it isn't helping we have so much incompetence on staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our receiving corps is pretty bare bones at this point but he's definitely not worth $22 million. He's either a candidate for a contract restructuring or a cap casualty. The problem is replacing his production. TMJ showing anything would really help make the decision easier. Ultimately I think maybe you add a year, cut his base salary down and turn it into a 2 year $22 million deal. That way you have a neglible effect on your cap compared to cutting him outright and we don't have to be desperate to replace him. If he refuses, then cut him.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a bunch of us said that playing thr Saints with our salary cap on a bad team was not a good idea. well here we are.

My biggest question for the new staff is will they just eat these stupid cap decisions to just get it over with or will they phase them out when they can while makeing the most  due to how all the cap was just being pusbed back on a bunch of guys who the new staff probibly won't want?

Our cap specialist is someone that can GTFO with Rhule while we are at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, Hooker was a guy that was drafted in the 3rd round pick sitting behind a well established starter yet Detroit somehow saw enough to let him go after two offseasons.  Where does that fit into your ideal situation?
    • Like that matters. That's the first thing. I suggested that it's probably better to let a QB sit and learn, and that's what I meant. Secondly, in what planet am I making excuses, my friend, or engaging in any mental gymnastics in Bryce Young's defense? As I have said, I don't care if he turns into Mighty Mouse, it's time for him to go. In my opinion, he's too short to be a successful QB in the NFL. I have seen enough. I'd rather trade him and take my chances with Hooker, at least he's more of a prototypical size and can actually see where and why he's throwing the ball.
    • There is a scenario where our team comes out prepared to play football instead of shitting the bed for the first quarter. Every bad Bryce game seems to start with him looking incompetent - the OL looking incompetent - and the defense looking incompetent.  Boom, down 14 before we know what hit us. Imagine a world where we come prepared and play with a lead, and Bryce gets to fulfill his ceiling by managing a game instead of playing catch up. He's bad, but upon reflection he is not Clausen bad.  He can move the team down the field when he gets 4 - 5 seconds in a clean pocket against a soft zone.  I don't think Clausen could do that.
×
×
  • Create New...