Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason to keep Robbie Anderson after this year?

Snake

By Snake,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Damn it.   Makes me hate fitt and Hurley even more.   No good reason to extend either of the two. 
 

so we have to wait until the off season to trade cmac?

Yep. And it still costs about 19M then. Which should go well with the 20M hole that’s already been dug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cam Lawter Mentor

Cam Lawter

Posted
Posted (edited)

There is no way you trade CMAC for a first. He is the Panthers at this point. The man can do it all and you wanna give him up for another Derrick Brown?  Our roster isn't terrible. Seems like Snow is making our defense look worse than it should be and we are only an offensive line away from having a manageable offense if we had a decent Head Coach.

Edited by Cam Lawter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

I like Robbie personally but as far as production goes it's common sense he is not what we had hoped for and if not for the Temple connection we never would have brought him in at all. I remember when we thought wide receiver was going to be a strength for the first time in many years. We do have some talent there but it isn't helping we have so much incompetence on staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted (edited)

Our receiving corps is pretty bare bones at this point but he's definitely not worth $22 million. He's either a candidate for a contract restructuring or a cap casualty. The problem is replacing his production. TMJ showing anything would really help make the decision easier. Ultimately I think maybe you add a year, cut his base salary down and turn it into a 2 year $22 million deal. That way you have a neglible effect on your cap compared to cutting him outright and we don't have to be desperate to replace him. If he refuses, then cut him.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

a bunch of us said that playing thr Saints with our salary cap on a bad team was not a good idea. well here we are.

My biggest question for the new staff is will they just eat these stupid cap decisions to just get it over with or will they phase them out when they can while makeing the most  due to how all the cap was just being pusbed back on a bunch of guys who the new staff probibly won't want?

Our cap specialist is someone that can GTFO with Rhule while we are at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL.  That’s not his tree.  Not in Seattle, Tampa or here.  Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC.  That’s what Bryce needs to happen though  2 very different things….and very much gets into why the middle school QB doesn’t fit 
×
×
  • Create New...