Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who is better, Stroud or Young?


Randolph Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I love everything about Stroud. His size, his arm, his accuracy. The guy has it all. But so have so many other OSU QBs. Their problem is Day scheme’s so well that all they need to do is get the ball to wide open receivers every play. Then when they get to the NFL and have to read professions and throw into tight coverage, it looks horrible. Fields is on coach #2 and still can’t hit the broad side of a barn at this level. 
 

Young’s problem is he’s fragile and tiny, but he improvises like a magician. He also can put the ball into tight windows.

I honestly don’t know what the team should do assuming we draft 1st. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HarbingersDad said:

I love everything about Stroud. His size, his arm, his accuracy. The guy has it all. But so have so many other OSU QBs. Their problem is Day scheme’s so well that all they need to do is get the ball to wide open receivers every play. Then when they get to the NFL and have to read professions and throw into tight coverage, it looks horrible. Fields is on coach #2 and still can’t hit the broad side of a barn at this level. 
 

Young’s problem is he’s fragile and tiny, but he improvises like a magician. He also can put the ball into tight windows.

I honestly don’t know what the team should do assuming we draft 1st. 

Yes, watching Stroud, his WRs are always wide open. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young’s size worries me about his durability. I like Stroud more, but he’s a one read QB. If we are sitting on top, I bet they both stay in school. 
 

I would bet on Levis, Hooker, or Hartman. 
 

I despise Wake Forest but I’ve had this weird feeling for a while now that Sam Hartman is going to have a Panthers uniform. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...