Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Walker will start VS Bucs and “Moving forward” (week by week)


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

They will probably throw on every down.  Which won't be many for the offense because there be some ints mixed in.

The defense show get a lot of play if Brady doesn't go through them like a gas station hotdog that is.

This game could get out of hand in a hurry.

yea...brady is pissed after last week...he'll dice us like surgeon.... after all, he didn't leave his wife to get beat by the likes of Pickett...

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

This is exactly what the feeling was in 2010. I feel the same way.

Id just stick with PJ. Getting that #1 pick is important. 

I mean, you can run the gameplan Wilks did with any QB.  And then it doesn’t matter who you start. 

I mean, PJ sucks but this staff did everyone wrong last week.   I mean, keep doing that and you are going to have problems IMO with others on the roster at some point. 

I mean you can let them play.  With PJ and McAdoo you aren’t beating the Bucs letting them play.  It will be ok.  You don’t need the fetal position offense. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're probably gonna see Darnold again soon. He's gonna suck ass... again. Then we'll see Baker back once his ankle is healthy.

I just hope it all ends up netting us the #1 overall pick. It's all we have left to cheer for.

We should trade for Josh Rosen.  Just to be sure we get the #1 pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...