Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Some of y’all are losing it. 
 

Lobbying against the best QB in the upcoming draft because he ‘might get injured.’ Now complaining when we received significant draft capital for a player who actually has been injured most of the last two years. 

The same people would be losing their poo if he were to get hurt at some point in the next 11 games and saying we should have traded him for whatever we could get. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I look forward to the day Fitterer is fired

Isn’t this what you wanted? All this should have seemed inevitable the day Matt Rhule was fired. And if I remember correctly, you were one of the engineers on the “Fire Matt Rhule” train. So embrace it, love it, and feel proud that you got what you wanted.

The truth is that good, and great players will not sit through two rebuilds as it diminishes their value, or capital potential for a new contract after the current one expires. 

It should be apparent to you, and everyone else, that this offense that the next coach will build will be open to any style that they prefer and may be completely different to what they have played over the past four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

I assumed people would be ok with getting decent picks for an of injured running back. 

 

Think people wanted the first.   Value looked to be there given what we got. 

So it’s only natural that it stirs up our GM’s tendency to value quantity over quality with draft picks.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all the “mock drafts are more important than players” people will be happy but as we saw with fitterer’s original draft here-a pointless slew of mid round picks a good football team does not make

this was just fitterer chasing his own tail trying to rectify the mistakes he made

”we can’t have just four picks!”

lol you’re the one that gave them away. Take your medicine.

this honestly reminds me of the post lockout spending spree.

 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would've been the point of us grinding down and already injury prone CMC into the dirt the remaining 11 games when we know we are going to keep losing and further hurting his trade value and while having him being the highest paid RB in the league. The free agent RB class this year is super deep, and you can sign someone for pennies on the dollar compared to what we would've been paying CMC and probably receive similar production. Then there's the draft which always has late round starting RB's come out every year. Despite how great of a player CMC is it's the modern NFL and RB's are a dime a dozen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...