Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers tried to trade for DJ Moore...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

You need WRs, OL, PRs, and obviously a QB. I imagine it would take a lot to move a young talented player at any of these positions. LBs, RBs, TEs can be replaced by a serviceable player for pretty cheap. 

We have our OL set, a young talented WR and one that’s starting to flash in TMJ, a young talented PR in Burns, and an anchor in Brown. Chinn and Horn come in and give us talent at all levels of the defense (assuming we eventually get Chinn back at LB). There is no need to strip this roster down. Just add a young QB in the draft and develop him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rags said:

Looking at how WR contracts are structered, idk why ppl want to get rid of D.J.

really good deal for the talent level.

Before the contract, I would have been ok with a trade.  Assuming the compensation was enough.

Now that we've traded CMC and Robby and DJ is extended, I really don't see the point.  We need somebody on offense for a QB to throw to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
theinstrumental Community Regular

theinstrumental

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not sure if the tweet for a second was for Claypool only or all of them.  DJ is far more valuable than a 2nd and I am glad we didn't trade him for a 2nd.

Has to be just about Claypool, that’s Green Bay’s FO trying to make it look like they made the same offer Chicago made and it’s not their fault that they didn’t get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, theinstrumental said:

Has to be just about Claypool, that’s Green Bay’s FO trying to make it look like they made the same offer Chicago made and it’s not their fault that they didn’t get him.

The second round pick was for Claypool but the Steelers felt the Bears second round pick would be a higher pick than the Packers so they went with that. Plus, I love Justin Fields, but no offense.... Claypool would look significantly better with Rodgers throwing to him than Fields. If he plays up to his potential it looks like fair value for Chicago and Pitt. If he boomed under Rodgers the Steelers would look like they got robbed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 52Beast
      Mike Jackson

      By 52Beast · Posted

      Exactly.  You let him play out next season and continue to develop Thorton.  Jackson’s earned his next contract, but his age and the risk of tying up such a large portion of the payroll at one position leads me to believe that we’ll let him walk. In all likelihood, we’ll draft another CB, or two, and bring in some journeymen to fill the roster void, between now and the start of the 2027 season.  That’ll create more balance financially across the roster enabling us to invest in other areas.  
    • strato
      I’m just not impressed with these hires/openings

      By strato · Posted

      As far as the NFCS … I think this division will be hotly contested the next couple of years.   I am tending to pay more respect to both Atlanta and the Saints n terms of how strong they will be moving forward, than not.    I am mixed on Ryan but think they have a decent roster to start with. I don’t think he blundered hiring Stefanski. And that offense can be dangerous with a QB. Plus, defense is arrow up. No 1st round pick, WB issues will dull their effectiveness. Question is, to what degree?   I think Moore is going to be a good HC and can overcome tape that people have on Shough. They need a lot but they were playing with people. Just the way you want to see all the way to the end.    Not sure about Tampa they have Mayfield but I don’t think they can maintain their success and Bowles is not going to last much longer. They have to go through all that. Gonna be tough once it starts. Might already have started.    For us I feel pretty good about Morgan. But less so about our offense, we have some short term RB and OL issues and those things are critical given what we are working with at QB.  Overall, mixed. Like a lot of what I see but some major question marks remain.     
    • UnluckyforSome
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Absolutely. If we are talking about a 20 year old youngster. He's a grown-ass man, and he doesn't know what his job entails or how to do it? Maybe he will be better next year! It's the Panther way.
×
×
  • Create New...