Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it OVER for Wilks????


 Share

polls  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade Wilks so far

    • A
      2
    • B
      54
    • C
      86
    • D
      21
    • F
      6
  2. 2. Do you want Wilks in 2023?

    • Yes
      31
    • No
      138


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

7-17 record as a head coach. 

Any other corporate manager would be out of work with a 40% rate of success.

Only in the world of sports do a lot of unsuccessful managers keep getting hired by someone who thinks anything will change.

Sorry, less than 30% success rate.

Would you trust your financial manager with your money if his investment recommendations only panned out 30% of the time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Holiday said:

Too early to say, so Tampa plays cincy tonight, if they lose and we win out we could still take the division.

I would like to feel that way but common logic forces me to realize that the Panthers are currently not a playoff caliber team.

 I really wanted them to make the playoffs, but now it is becoming apparent it would be in their best interest to fogus on the 2023 draft and forget a playoff berth that seems to have passed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

No way to answer that question since its impossible to know how good they are until they actually play in the NFL.  Personally, I am not sure Stroud or Young will be good NFL qb's, although I would be willing to try if we got a chance to draft them.    I will say that if the guys that make the decision on who to draft decide a college qb is actually good enough to be a legit NFL qb, then we draft them regardless of whether we are picking first or 31st.  

just think that Montana wasn't drafted until the 3rd round. Brady not till the 6th or round. Mahomes wasn't drafted until the 14th pick. Allen was drafted at the 7th pick by Buffalo. So you can get a good QB after the 1st round. Remember Montana was too small to be drafted sooner.

 

14 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

No way to answer that question since its impossible to know how good they are until they actually play in the NFL.  Personally, I am not sure Stroud or Young will be good NFL qb's, although I would be willing to try if we got a chance to draft them.    I will say that if the guys that make the decision on who to draft decide a college qb is actually good enough to be a legit NFL qb, then we draft them regardless of whether we are picking first or 31st.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cmichd08 said:

just think that Montana wasn't drafted until the 3rd round. Brady not till the 6th or round. Mahomes wasn't drafted until the 14th pick. Allen was drafted at the 7th pick by Buffalo. So you can get a good QB after the 1st round. Remember Montana was too small to be drafted sooner.

 

 

There is alot oh wrong in this post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks is never gonna outscheme anyone

his mentality is were going to be the more physical and aggressive team and impose our will on you

The complete opposite happened today

absolutely killed in the trenches and manhandled at the line of scrimmage against a team with nothing to play for, in the most important December game in 5 years, at home

 

sorry Steve i was rooting for you but that’s unforgivable

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s a big gap between the worst and great. He’s probably the same middle tier coach we’ve always had who can’t get over the hump. If he can run the table to the divisional round, I’d love to hope otherwise. But that’s the trajectory I see right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...