Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much to move up to #2 in Draft?


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That same sort of "eyeball test" got the 49ers Trey Lance.

 

Trey Lance went 6/10 for 72 yards in the FCS championship 

Stroud put up 350 yards and 4 tds and hung 40+ on a vaunted GA defense without his #1 WR and the #2 WR also getting hurt in the game.

Plus Lance was known as a project who only really played one year of college football at a lower level. And he played like one game this year prior to getting hurt. It’s too early to declare him a failure.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

That same sort of "eyeball test" got the 49ers Trey Lance.

 

Have you watched Stroud at all this season? Genuinely curious. Lance isn’t even in the same stratosphere. 
 

by eyeball test I also include the clutch part of elite talent to make poo happen when the other side knows you’re the only one to make poo happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

Have you watched Stroud at all this season? Genuinely curious. Lance isn’t even in the same stratosphere. 

by eyeball test I also include the clutch part of elite talent to make poo happen when the other side knows you’re the only one to make poo happen. 

Yes, I have. He's a great college quarterback.

I'm not convinced he'll be a great pro quarterback.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Knaakedup said:

Not too much at all when you could potentially get a franchise QB. 

Potentially?  You mean success is not guaranteed?  In case you missed the game, we were exposed at several positions.  Too many needs to trade the farm for a player that may or may not be the answer at QB.  We are not one player away from the super bowl.

Take a shot at Levis or Richardson if you must but we have many more holes to fill without trying to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...