Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints let's get this over with GameDay thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, GOAT said:

if we lose what's our projected pick vs if we win?

 

I think it depends on what the team we're tied with do.  We needed the Raiders to win yesterday and they got blown out....they'll pick before us no matter what we do today.  We need Atlanta to win...if they don't, I think they also stay above us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

 

 

Would have no problem  with this 

IF

1. A seasoned and experienced DC is hired that maps to the offensive philosophy  yep I said the team’s offensive philosophy 

2. He has a former HC as a mentor 

3.  If he insists on calling plays, there needs to be an experienced assistant HC on his offensive staff 

4  the OL already here maps to the offensive philosophy 

for God’s sake be smart about this Tepper  details man  details  that’s where the devil is 

we do not need another wasted three years as these guys learn what they should be. ie Rivera for one and Rhule for another 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...