Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule files Suit against the Panthers


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

This is the point. From Rhule, to Cam, to "Stop Pounding", to bad turf, to a failed practice facility...

Hiring Frank Reich doesnt erase the ways Tepper has dropped the ball. 

I don't really think anybody "loves" Tepper right now.

There are however some of us who think it's at least possible that he just made a major decision without screwing it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule is a fuging douche who shouldn’t get another dime from the team ethically. Legally, the panthers have a bit of an uphill battle to fight if the offset clause is clear in the contract. I wouldn’t piss on Rhule if he was on fire but he’ll probably get his money or most of it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the legal dispute here is above board, for the record. basic contract language litigation, and it'll go to an arbitrator, so there will almost certainly be a settlement of some sort.

I just think it reflects poorly on Rhule on a personal level. so in that sense, just add it to the list of other things that have transpired since he left the Panthers.

but overall it's pretty clear there is actual acrimony between Tepper and Rhule. parlor drama, yes, but it does make Tepper's "mistake" comments seem a little more emphatic, doesn't it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vorbis said:

I think the legal dispute here is above board, for the record. basic contract language litigation, and it'll go to an arbitrator, so there will almost certainly be a settlement of some sort.

I just think it reflects poorly on Rhule on a personal level. so in that sense, just add it to the list of other things that have transpired since he left the Panthers.

but overall it's pretty clear there is actual acrimony between Tepper and Rhule. parlor drama, yes, but it does make Tepper's "mistake" comments seem a little more emphatic, doesn't it.

Rhule is literally doing what every other coach would be doing along with everyone on this board.  Tepper owes him.  Saying it reflects poorly on Rhule is just fandom getting in the way IMO.  How bad of a coach Rhule was doesn't really matter. 

Offset clauses are routine.  Tepper owes him.  Tepper just using his big checkbook to pay him less.  Hardly something to celebrate Tepper over.  Part of what is wrong w/ this entire country.  The mega wealthy using their money to screw people over. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Rhule is literally doing what every other coach would be doing along with everyone on this board.  Tepper owes him.  Saying it reflects poorly on Rhule is just fandom getting in the way IMO.  How bad of a coach Rhule was doesn't really matter. 

Offset clauses are routine.  Tepper owes him.  Tepper just using his big checkbook to pay him less.  Hardly something to celebrate Tepper over.  Part of what is wrong w/ this entire country.  The mega wealthy using their money to screw people over. 

Meh, this is literally just two douchebags playing a game.

If Rhules Nebraska contract wasnt backloaded in salary Tepper wouldn't owe him anything, but because his contract escalates every year from 5 million to 12 million by the end then Tepper ends up owing him because of the first few seasons being below what he was being paid here.

He's basically suing to get a free 5 million from Tepper even though his Nebraska contract per  year is higher than the one he signed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

So true. It’s so funny how hated he is that people think he should just walk away from money he’s likely owed. I assume the $5M is the difference from his overall contract amount minus what he was already paid and his Nebraska deal. It’s offset language meaning he can’t get from Tepper what Nebraska is paying him but I’d think his contract says he gets the difference assuming Nebraska pays him less. If I’m owed $5M, I’m going to try and get it unless I breached the contract, which he didn’t.

LOL, there’s even people saying he stole money from “us” so he should just go away. As if someone other than Tepper paid him.

Apparently there are grown ass men concerned with how Tepper spends his money. They're also grown ass men who think that it's OK to call Rhule everything but a son of God because he's a bad pro football coach. They're also grown men who think it's OK tell people "fug you," because they supported Rhule, and grown men who have the nerve to tell people what and what not to poo on when half of the poo they do is just poo on people's posts. 

-----

I would like for one of these grown ass men to tell me why I or anyone should care about whether Tepper has to pay Rhule. Why do you care, motherfugers? Why? Are you that damned petty? Why do you not think it's a good idea to put this thing to bed and move on? Do you have a mature response, much less anything credible to say as to why Tepper paying Rhule five million dollars bothers you so damned much that you'd poo a post on a message board? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...