Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan - "Carolina Zeroed in on Stroud and Richardson"


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/17/2023 at 5:44 PM, CarolinaRideorDie said:

FrcuXe4WwBcmkC6?format=jpg&name=4096x409

Andy Dalton: "So Josh, who am I backing up this year?"

Josh McCown "Look at all of these "sources" that know who we're going to pick!" 

I've always wanted Josh McCown back in the building. He seems to be happy as heck and I'm happy for him, now put our QBs to work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2023 at 4:29 PM, Jon Snow said:

You assume you can trade to any slot you want. You also assume the qb they want will be available. You are also assuming you know the qb preferences of all teams ahead of them.  They ONLY way you insure your qb will be there is getting the 1st pick.

Agreed. All these scenarios have several assumptions baked in. “You could just get Richardson at 9” - there is literally no way to know that.

Like fit said, if you like a guy you go get him. Can’t overstate the value of controlling our own destiny.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly believe our front office knows exactly who team sources communicate with and are playing games. 

It would be a very easy thing to manipulate. Let the different want to be sources run with whatever they like.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're picking Drake Maye with the 1st over all pick.   Yes,  we pick some one who isn't currently eligible . But we will own his rights in January 2024 and sign him then..  This is sorta like the Boston Celtics signing Larry Bird the year before and no one else could draft him after his Sr year.  So we won't have  a  QB from this class.  

Per my source we moved up to first because 5 other teams were going to do the same thing.  ( Texans and Colts )   This is 3 D chess.  

Per  " my " sources , I have made all this up like all the others tweeting out personal opinions who just want to see their own name retweeted.   NO ONE KNOWS WHO WE'LL PICK

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2023 at 11:12 PM, Jon Snow said:

It's going to be Richardson. 

i Honestly think this is where we are going.  I think his interview at the combine showed he is an intelligent QB and with the proper coaching, which we have, will make him the best QB in this draft.  Mabye sooner than later.

I do believe we will do our due diligence and have each QB in for a visit and workout.  I think Reich and McCown will see the potential and take a chance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

i Honestly think this is where we are going.  I think his interview at the combine showed he is an intelligent QB and with the proper coaching, which we have, will make him the best QB in this draft.  Mabye sooner than later.

I do believe we will do our due diligence and have each QB in for a visit and workout.  I think Reich and McCown will see the potential and take a chance.  

I also think that scouts have his floor rated much higher than the average Joe that's watching games. The reason being is his physical running, which wasn't really utilized much last season, is something that could keep the chains moving his first couple of seasons before refining as a passer.

A lot of quarterbacks in their first year starting have poor passing statistics. I'm wondering how much Richardson would improve in his second year, in college or the NFL. If he can come up to a 60% completion percentage, with his running ability, he might get off to a faster start than some think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I promise you the Panthers didn't trade all the way up to 1 and not have their guy in mind. My gut says its CJ Stroud and were trying to get Houston to blink and give us a high second round pick to take Young at one but I promise you the Panthers know who they are going to draft no matter what they say or leak 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...