Albert Breer: Bryce Young scored 98 on his S2 teat

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

Am I not allowed to reshuffle my QB board?

sure but dont be a dick about it

[SmokinwithWilly]

28 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

A lot has happened since then. I had time to watch the film. 

 

Also the reason I preferred Stroud was mainly because of the height and durability. We have the #1 pick we need to take the best QB regardless of size. After watching the film I came to the conclusion Bryce is a better overall QB.

 

Will I be mad if Stroud is the pick? Hell no. I still like Stroud. I like AR as well. But the best QB if you ask me is Bryce Young.

 

Am I not allowed to reshuffle my QB board?

Of course you can. The last sentence just read like you'd been on the CY bandwagon all along. 

[ForJimmy]

40 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There are a few posters on here that most certainly hedged their bets

People can be satisfied with either choice.  I prefer Stroud, but will be happy with Young or AR as well.  All 3 have some nice traits to work with IMO.  

[frankw]

52 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Once you consider he was probably holding around 10lbs in water weight that weekend it’s no surprise he didn’t throw or do any on field stuff

I'm genuinely curious why people talk about this like it's whatever while CJ Stroud apparently has character concerns now. I mean if we're talking a 2nd or 3rd round pick that's one thing but a guy going to these lengths to avoid weighing in too light sounds uh risky. Especially when considering how many people look at Richardson and shriek at the thought of taking him at 1.

Edited April 13, 2023 by frankw

[Wolfcop]

I would’ve told Young he needs to get on the damn scale if he wants to be the first pick. I’d have the true number or I’d move on. 

Edited April 13, 2023 by Wolfcop

[AceBoogie]

4 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

While that score is very impressive, hasn't he taken it a ton of times before (If I remember hearing that correctly)? If that is the case, I think that would help lead to getting a higher score since you know what to expect, as opposed to taking it for the first time.

Haters gonna hate. That speaks to preparation. Everyone else had this same opportunity. He took it, and that says something about him. 

Edited April 13, 2023 by AceBoogie

[*FreeFua*]

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm genuinely curious why people talk about this like it's whatever while CJ Stroud apparently has character concerns now. I mean if we're talking a 2nd or 3rd round pick that's one thing but a guy going to these lengths to avoid weighing in too light sounds uh risky. Especially when considering how many people look at Richardson and shriek at the thought of taking him at 1.

For the record I’d be completely fine with AR at 1

[Eric4280]

3 hours ago, Panthering said:

Does it test 300 lb lineman landing on him? 

Ah yes this lazy argument. College football is full of preteens and cupcakes.

[mav1234]

4 hours ago, Varking said:

 

This absolutely matters. It doesn't mean you discount it entirely but it's important context to his result.

[top dawg]

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It applies moreso to him. He was my favorite going into last year when all of you were arguing over Howell and and the Pickets of the draft. He is a year ahead of the rest of the class in development.  He played more games and studied more tape than the rest of the class. He's practiced the S2 since HS so he gets no bump for that. 

I've come to see that those things alone will not make him successful in the nfl. He has limitations that set him back to the point that he's not the best choice in this class.  He needs the least development, sure but he's near his ceiling in mental aspects of the game.

He's just not a safe or sure pick to make it in the nfl. That put him on equal footing with the rest of the class when to take everything into consideration. 

Limitations aren't really proven. They are simply projections based out of fear when you get right down to it. I'm sure he's faced doubters since he was a child, but he continued to prove people wrong all along the way. He's been the best of the bunch.

[top dawg]

11 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Ah yes this lazy argument. College football is full of preteens and cupcakes.

It also has grown men, particularly in the SEC.

[CPF4LIFE]

49 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Nah I was really all Stroud. Then it hit me we can't miss on this pick because of a size factor. Watching the film Young simply has a bigger ceiling with his ability to escape pressure. Stroud doesn't have that ability to make something out of nothing.

 

But like I said im fine with either of the 3 QB's. I just think Young is the best of the bunch.

Its not just about size...it never was and CJ has plenty athleticism to make plays on the move. He just didnt need too. Some of yall just choose to make it about that. And it wasnt just the Georgia game where he showed it either. Lol 

[top dawg]

22 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I would’ve told Young he needs to get on the damn scale if he wants to be the first pick. I’d have the true number or I’d move on. 

We already know that his playing weight at Bama was a buck and the low to mid nineties. 

[Jon Snow]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Limitations aren't really proven. They are simply projections based out of fear when you get right down to it. I'm sure he's faced doubters since he was a child, but he continued to prove people wrong all along the way. He's been the best of the bunch.

He has been I agree. The goal should be who will be the best in the nfl. He was the best in college until Hooker came along. But Hooker got hurt and removed himself from the discussion. The question they are trying to answer is who's going to be their guy for the next 10 years or more.  I would take Young over Stroud anytime but given another choice I'm looking hard at other options.  But that just me.