Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grass field


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't they have it on rails to roll it out side the stadium or am I drunk?

Rolling on 546 steel wheels which rest on 13 railroad-like tracks the field travels the 740 feet inside or out of the stadium in approximately 70 minutes at the push of a button

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

I want turf too but people keep citing that Christmas Eve game where it was unprecedentedly cold. The grass wouldn’t have felt much better.

Actually it would have. Grass is more of a cushion than turf and even cold dirt is much softer than concrete

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I wonder how hard/easy it is to get that much grass transplanted in 4 months before the season starts... any commerical scale lawn peeps here?

I am good with bermuda in my small lawn... but not efficient in any other types.. especialy at that size. 

With their resources they would be fine and would be plenty of time. 
 

Problem is going to be the soccer team playing on it until November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I do commercial lawns on large scale. The issue isn't so much the transplanting, it's the time that it takes for it to sufficiently root well. Depending on grass type there is a 4-6 week time period for it to root and then there is a period when the grass has to be trained to be mowed to a certain height. Different varieties take different lengths of time. I know that there are concerns from a financial standpoint of being able to do concerts and tearing up the field, but it is doable. The key to all of it is making sure the base has adequate drainage and I would install some type of heating underneath to be able to assist in keeping it relatively dry/thawed to prevent turf damage. Turf management is a science, especially on heavily used areas. Lots of variables and a constantly changing environment. 

This is amongst some of the best content on the forum. I appreciate this post and the knowledge of your craft. Keep on mowin' 🍻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I do commercial lawns on large scale. The issue isn't so much the transplanting, it's the time that it takes for it to sufficiently root well. Depending on grass type there is a 4-6 week time period for it to root and then there is a period when the grass has to be trained to be mowed to a certain height. Different varieties take different lengths of time. I know that there are concerns from a financial standpoint of being able to do concerts and tearing up the field, but it is doable. The key to all of it is making sure the base has adequate drainage and I would install some type of heating underneath to be able to assist in keeping it relatively dry/thawed to prevent turf damage. Turf management is a science, especially on heavily used areas. Lots of variables and a constantly changing environment. 

This is amongst some of the best content on the forum. I appreciate this post and the knowledge of your craft. Keep on mowin' 🍻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Actually it would have. Grass is more of a cushion than turf and even cold dirt is much softer than concrete

I don’t know. I remember walking outside that morning and thinking that my grass felt like concrete. It was miserably cold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we might just have to rely on what appears to be unanimous information/sentiment from the players that actually play on it have regarding the difference to form a logical conclusion rather than our ‘but I watch NFL on TV’ experts here on the huddle

but i dk

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much about artificial turf, but it looks like roughly 1/2 the teams play on grass and 1/2 on artificial turf.  Of the stadiums with artificial turf, 5 use the same brand as BOA (Field Turf).  Could the brand of turf have played a factor into it's playability that day?  I notice that New England also has Field Turf and they must play in cold weather.  Do they have a process to prepare the field for play in cold weather in some way?  Or were the weather conditions in Charlotte just that extreme that day?  Also since the field at BOA met the playability specifications by some time in the first half, should/could the start of the game simply have been delayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's just a talking head.  Talking about gambling. If anybody takes the under on 4.5 wins, they're most likely losing their money.   So he's only saying if you want to bet on a possible sleeper, take the over.  It's not rocket science.  Pathetic that so many on the huddle have reduced themselves to posting purely trash every time they hit the submit button.
    • I mean I think the best case scenario has to hit for the Panthers and everyone else in the NFCS has to hit their worst case scenario.  Personally, I think this is the year that NO finally collapses and I think they finish 4th in the division regardless.  ATL is overrated but still likely a 6-9 win team. TB plays tough football, their defense will be there but their success depends on the offense, they too are a 6-9 win team.  The Panthers are probably 4-6 wins at best. If they find some sort of momentum during the season and get 7-8 wins, and TB and ATL struggle then maybe but I find it very unlikely. 
    • We screwed up a couple years ago taking Bryce in the first place.  Nobody held a gun to our head to jump from #9 to #1.  Most people who keep up with draft news knew this 2024 QB class was loaded and we should have waited, which I advocated. It was a dumb move and I knew it.  Now we have to roll with Bryce another year.  That's fine, because this 2025 class isn't that great.  I like Ewers, but not super high on him.  If Bryce shows improvement, which I think he will, that should get him at least one more season before we have to decide on if he's the permanent answer or not.  I've said before, the 2026 draft is the next window for a franchise QB if Bryce isn't the answer. Bryce gets this year and next at a minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...