Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Bojangles bad now or is it just me


 Share

Bojangles  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Bojangles

    • Its good
      10
    • Its bad
      14


Recommended Posts

The one by my old house off Gold Hill and 160 in SC was good at times and bad at times. Depending on which staff was there, I could tell whether I was going to be disappointed or not. lol! 

But as I posted in the Bryce contract thread, the one in the American Airlines terminal has always been good for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

It's been bad for years now.

 

Bojangles was my first job in high school. It was pretty good back in the early/mid 2000's.

 

 

I get it maybe twice a year now and each visit is underwhelming. It's a tourist spot now sadly. They are pretty dead in my area we have like 5 locations and I rarely see long traffic lines anymore.

 

In the Triangle, the only place that I see with longer lines than BoJangles is Chic-Fil-A. 

If I'm buying fried chicken, I ain't going to KFC, and I ain't going to Smithfield's Chicken & Barbecue; I'm going to BoJangles. Granted, I haven't had Popeyes. Church's Chicken was only OK when I was broke. BoJangles all the way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on which one you go to and who is working that day. Bojangles is the most hit or miss fast food I’ve ever had. Can be completely orgasmic or have you eating a few bites and tossing it. Fries can be caked in seasoning to where it is inedible or no seasoning at all. Fries can also be hard as a rock or perfectly warm and soft yet slightly crispy. Chicken can be tough and chewy or warm with juices flowing out. When it’s great, it’s the best fast food you can get. Never know what to expect. It’s the bojangles lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ghostface Chilla said:

The one by my old house off Gold Hill and 160 in SC was good at times and bad at times. Depending on which staff was there, I could tell whether I was going to be disappointed or not. lol! 

But as I posted in the Bryce contract thread, the one in the American Airlines terminal has always been good for me. 

This is the one I go to when my wife wants some of that greasy crap. Staffing issues of course. That grease makes me a little queasy at times.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...