Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants game


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You don't hang banners for undefeated preseasons. And(fingers crossed) we have been very healthy this offseason overall.

No reason to risk health for something like this.

It’s obvious af that we want to get out of the preseason healthy. However, i guess it’s not obvious to some….

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tepper had 1 job this offseason. He screwed that up!

 

Steve Wilks won't return to Panthers in 2023, reports say | wcnc.com

Could end up that way. Or could be neither were going to be the answer we needed. Both candidates have already had their chance at the big seat previously regardless of how you might feel their exit was fair or unfair. All in all it comes back to this franchise seems to be snakebit. What can ya do? 🤷‍♂️

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

It’s obvious af that we want to get out of the preseason healthy. However, i guess it’s not obvious to some….

What does that even mean? They’re playing professional football. How do you take steps to make sure you stay healthy? All I see is our 1s and 2s getting beat at every position.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

the good news is Bryce has looked the part despite the poo around him

Honestly how can you even tell with the majority of the play calls resulting in Hubbard trying to run it up Bozeman’s ass hole.

I’d like to see Young get an opportunity to sling it a little bit.

And if it’s about our offensive line not being able to protect him I don’t understand how that magically changes come the regular season. O-Line play is more about sheer technique and talent than actual game planning (assuming someone doesn’t just absolutely blow their blocking assignment).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...